1994 P Cr (PLP)
GHULAM MUSTAFA and 5 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1994 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | GHULAM MUSTAFA and 5 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 P Cr (PLP) (GHULAM MUSTAFA and 5 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M. Anwar Sipra for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.365/342/148/149/337-A(ii)
Application of S.365, P.P.C. being open to serious objection had been deleted by the police during investigation Accused admittedly were involved in bailable offences
Judgment & Decree
M. Anwar Sipra for Petitioners. Sohrab Ajmal for the State. The petitioners who are involved in a case under section 365/342, 148/149, 337-A-II, P.P.C. arising out of F.I.R. No.383 dated 19-12-1992 registered at Police Station City Gojra, seek to be admitted to bail.
2. As per F.I.R. the petitioners are alleged to have taken away Zahid P.W. on 17-12-1992 at about 10-00 a.m. from Chak No.371/JB and assaulted him; as a result whereof he sustained about 20 injuries on his person. Thereafter, the petitioners called upon a barber and allegedly shaved his head and moustaches etc.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that according to the police report as well as the F.I.R. the offences are bailable ones, and the learned Additional Sessions Judge has erred in law while cancelling the bail in a case which does not fall either within the prohibitory clause or the category of non-bailable offences.
4. Learned counsel for the State after consulting the police file stated that the, challan has been submitted for offences which are bailable and section A 365, P.P.C. has been deleted by the police during the investigation.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the police record. Admittedly the petitioners are involved in offences which are bailable ones, the application of section 365, P.P.C. is open to serious objection; hence the petitioners are admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand only) with one surety each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial Magistrate. N.H.Q./G-131/L Bail allowed.