1972 PLP 470 (SCMR)
BARKAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
| Citation | 1972 PLP 470 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BARKAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1972 PLP 470 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1972 PLP 470 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1972 PLP 470 (SCMR) (BARKAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Malik Saeed Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing;: 2nd October 1972.
- Supreme Court Rules, O. XXVI, r. S‑Review, application for‑No application for review, except with special leave of Court can be drawn by any Advocate other than one who appeared at hearing of case, judgment or order whereof is sought to be reviewed‑Such Advocate must also, unless his presence dispenses with, be present at hearing of application for review‑Review petition drawn by Advocate other than one who conducted leave petition dismissed.
- It appears from the record that Mr. K. H. Khurshid argued the above petition and under the rules except with the special leave of the Court, no application can be drawn by any Advocate other than the Advocate who appeared at the hearing of the case in which the judgment or order, sought to be reviewed, was made. It is also provided that such Advocate shall, unless his presence has been dispensed with, be present at the hearing of the applica tion for review. In this connection, reference may be made to Order XXVI, rule 5 of the Pakistan Supreme Court Rules.
Headnotes / Summary
(On review from the judgment and order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, dated the 4th April 1972, in Petition No. 26: of 1971). Supreme Court Rules, O. XXVI, r. S‑Review, application for‑No application for review, except with special leave of Court can be drawn by any Advocate other than one who appeared at hearing of case, judgment or order whereof is sought to be reviewed‑Such Advocate must also, unless his presence dispenses with, be present at hearing of application for review‑Review petition drawn by Advocate other than one who conducted leave petition dismissed. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
WAHEEDUDDIN AHMAD, J.‑This is a review petition against the order of this Court in Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 262 of 1971, dated the 4th April 1972. The petition was dismissed. It appears from the record that Mr. K. H. Khurshid argued the above petition and under the rules except with the special leave of the Court, no application can be drawn by any Advocate other than the Advocate who appeared at the hearing of the case in which the judgment or order, sought to be reviewed, was made. It is also provided that such Advocate shall, unless his presence has been dispensed with, be present at the hearing of the applica tion for review. In this connection, reference may be made to Order XXVI, rule 5 of the Pakistan Supreme Court Rules. In the present case, it is admitted by Mr. Saeed Hassan that the petition was drawn by him. It was not drawn by Mr. K. H. Khurshid who conducted the leave petition. Mr. K. H. Khurshid is also not present today. In these circumstances, the review petition is against the rules and is liable to be dismissed. We would, therefore, dismiss the review petition. Petition dismissed.