1987 P Cr (PLP)
HUSSAIN BUX‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Asadullah, J |
| Parties | HUSSAIN BUX‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Asadullah, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (HUSSAIN BUX‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Faiz Muhammad Khan Khosa for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 182‑‑Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance (VIII of 1979), S. 7‑‑Offence under S. 182, P. P. C . bailable‑ ‑Section 7 of Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance, having been added to make case serious and non‑bailable, such practice on part of Police deprecated‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Nasim Rashid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 987/ B of 1986, decided on 3rd November, 1986. ‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 182‑‑Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance (VIII of 1979), S. 7‑‑Offence under S. 182, P. P. C . bailable‑ ‑Section 7 of Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance, having been added to make case serious and non‑bailable, such practice on part of Police deprecated‑‑Bail granted in circumstances. Sardar Faiz Muhammad Khan Khosa for Petitioner. Nasim Rashid for the State. I need not go into the details of the case. Suffice it to say that it is doubtful whether the provisions of section 182, P. P. C. will apply in this case. In any case that offence is bailable. The real thing to be seen is whether section 7 of the Offence of Qazf (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance, 1979 is applicable to the case or not. It appears that the provisions of sections 3, 5 and 6 ibid do not apply to the case more so because the case might be covered within the exceptions mentioned in section 9 of the said Ordinance. It also appears that section 7 of the said Ordinance has been added to make the case serious and non‑bailable. Such a practice on the part of the police cannot be appreciated. However, the petitioner is entitled to bail. He is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.5,000 (Rupees five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, D.G. Khan. S.A./H‑5/L Bail granted.