2015 PLP 348 (GBLR)
RASH KHAN — Petitioner Versus AFZAL MEHMOOD CHAIRMAN WAPDA and 3 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2015 PLP 348 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | RASH KHAN — Petitioner Versus AFZAL MEHMOOD CHAIRMAN WAPDA and 3 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2015 PLP 348 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2015 PLP 348 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2015 PLP 348 (GBLR) (RASH KHAN — Petitioner Versus AFZAL MEHMOOD CHAIRMAN WAPDA and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Shafqat Wali, Senior Advocate for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Petitioner, claimed that according to the agreement arrived at between Government of Pakistan and the local affectees of 'Diamer Basha Dam', local affectees would be preferred for appointment in the project, subject to non-availability of the individuals of special qualification for the posts
Petitioner alleged that he, being a foreign qualified and experienced engineer, deserved the post, but he had been ignored by the authority and prayed that he be accommodated against any one of the posts
No question of public importance being involved, leave to appeal to Supreme Appellate Court was refused.
Judgment & Decree
DR. RANA MUHAMMAD SHAMIM, C.J.
The learned senior counsel for the petitioner contends that an agreement between Government of Pakistan and the local community/affectees of Diamer Basha Dam was executed on 25.02.2010. According to Clause-03 of the said agreement, the local affectees would be preferred for the employments in the projects under Diamer Basha Dam subject to non-availability of the individuals for the posts of special qualifications. He further contends that the Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) has ignored the local affectees and appointed officers from BPS-16 to above from down country which is against the agreement and the order dated 23.05.2011 of this apex Court. He further contends that the petitioner is an affectee of the Diamer Basha Dam and his immoveable property has been submerged in the reservoir. The petitioner being a foreign qualified and experienced engineer deserves for the post of General Manager but he has not been considered for the said post while violating the agreement in question and the order of this apex court. He submits that the respondents advertised some posts and invited applications thereto and last date was fixed as 01.11.2015. He prays that the petitioner be accommodated against any one of the posts. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at length, perused the record of the case file and gone through the order dated 13.04.2011 of this court. In our considered view no question of general public importance at large is involved, the leave to appeal is refused. Leave refused. HBT/181/GB Leave refused.