2001 PLP 353 (YLR)
MANZOOR MASIH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 353 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Bashir A. Mujahid, J |
| Parties | MANZOOR MASIH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 353 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 353 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Bashir A. Mujahid, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 353 (YLR) (MANZOOR MASIH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Pervaiz Aslam Ch. for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.11‑‑ Bail, grant of‑‑‑Daughter of the complainant/alleged abductee was also arrayed as an‑ accused in the case on the round that she had eloped on her own with the son of the accused and had contracted marriage with her own free‑will with him‑‑ Both, alleged abduetee and the son of the accused were granted bail and were facing trial ‑‑‑Challan of the case had been submitted and trial had already commenced‑‑‑No useful purpose could be served by keeping the accused behind the bars for an indefinite period‑‑‑Accused was also admitted to bail in circumstances. Muhammad Akram Nasir for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.11‑‑ Bail, grant of‑‑‑Daughter of the complainant/alleged abductee was also arrayed as an‑ accused in the case on the round that she had eloped on her own with the son of the accused and had contracted marriage with her own free‑will with him‑‑ Both, alleged abduetee and the son of the accused were granted bail and were facing trial ‑‑‑Challan of the case had been submitted and trial had already commenced‑‑‑No useful purpose could be served by keeping the accused behind the bars for an indefinite period‑‑‑Accused was also admitted to bail in circumstances. Pervaiz Aslam Ch. for Petitioner. Muhammad Akram Nasir for the State. Manzoor Masih son of Raja Masih, petitioner seeks post‑arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.567 of 1998, dated 9‑7‑1998, under section 11 of Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at Police Station, Shera Kot, Lahore for abduction of Mst. Nasreeen Bibi, daughter of complainant Ishaque Masih. After arrest bail was refused to the petitioner by learned Additional Sessions Judge, vide order, dated 12‑5‑2001. Learned counsel for the petitioner and for the State have been heard exhaustively and the record has been perused. Mst. Nasreen Bibi was also arrayed as an accused in the case as she eloped on her own with Nadeem son of the present petitioner and contracted marriage with her own free‑will. Both Mst. Nasreen and Nadeem were granted bail in the case and are facing trial. The petitioner is father of Nadeem co‑accused. Challan of the case has been submitted and trial has already commenced. No useful purpose can be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, he is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. H.B.T./M‑664/L Bail granted.