1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Mst. SAIRA BANO Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HEADQUARTERS, RAWALPINDI and 2 others
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | Mst. SAIRA BANO Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HEADQUARTERS, RAWALPINDI and 2 others |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (Mst. SAIRA BANO Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HEADQUARTERS, RAWALPINDI and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian Tariq Mahmood for Appellant.
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 31st July, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Civil servant was duly allotted house to live in, but she instead of occupying same, continued to remain in unauthorised possession of another house which was above her entitlement-- Authority served a written order on civil servant to vacate the house occupied by her unauthorisedly and to move into the house which already stood allotted to her
Civil servant despite receiving order of Authority, failed to vacate quarter and even abused party which was sent to get house vacated from civil servant
Civil servant who admittedly was in unlawful possession of house and did not vacate same despite various orders/directions given to her by competent Authorities was clearly guilty of misconduct and insubordination-- Civil servant thus was rightly dismissed from service by Authorities on allegation of misconduct and insubordination.
Judgment & Decree
Appeal No. 691/90 of 1988, decided on 5th August, 1991. Civil service
Civil servant was duly allotted house to live in, but she instead of occupying same, continued to remain in unauthorised possession of another house which was above her entitlement-- Authority served a written order on civil servant to vacate the house occupied by her unauthorisedly and to move into the house which already stood allotted to her
Civil servant despite receiving order of Authority, failed to vacate quarter and even abused party which was sent to get house vacated from civil servant
Civil servant who admittedly was in unlawful possession of house and did not vacate same despite various orders/directions given to her by competent Authorities was clearly guilty of misconduct and insubordination-- Civil servant thus was rightly dismissed from service by Authorities on allegation of misconduct and insubordination. Mian Tariq Mahmood for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 31st July, 1991.