1986 PLP 1533 (SCMR)
MIR AFZAL — Petitioner Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN Ltd. and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1533 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and Mian Burhanuddim Khan, JJ |
| Parties | MIR AFZAL — Petitioner Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN Ltd. and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1533 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1533 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and Mian Burhanuddim Khan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1533 (SCMR) (MIR AFZAL — Petitioner Versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN Ltd. and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Qazi Abdur Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 30th June, 1986.
- Qazi Abdur Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 18-9-1984 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in R . F . A . No. 11 of 1983) .
Art. 185(3)--Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance (XIX of 1979), S. 12(5)--Petitioner having failed to comply with direction of High Court to furnish Bank Guarantee, his appeal not admitted for regular hearing and ordered to be dismissed--Order impugned being entirely in accordance with law and not liable to any interference, leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.--The Peshawar High Court, while hearing the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of the Special Judge Banking Companies, N.W.F.P., Peshawer, directed the petitioner on 6-3-1984 to furnish Bank Guarantee equal to the decretal amount within two months before proceeding further with this appeal. He did not comply with this direction and instead submitted an application for permission to furnish personal security instead of a Bank Guarantee. This request was refused and as the petitioner had failed to comply with the earlier direction of the Court made under clause (5) of section 12 of the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979, his appeal was not admitted for regular hearing and ordered to be dismissed. This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the said order of the High Court. The order of the High Court impugned before us is entirely in accordance with law and is not liable to any interference. M . I . Petition dismissed.