MLD 2006

2006 PLP 936 (MLD)

NOMAN TAHIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7186-B of 2005, decided on 26th October, 2005.
Honorable Judges
Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2006 PLP 936 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, J
Parties NOMAN TAHIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 936 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 936 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 936 (MLD) (NOMAN TAHIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Tahir Naeem for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497(2)

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.489-B

Bail, grant of

Further inquiry

Prosecution during investigation had failed to collect any evidence that false currency note was prepared by the accused

Regarding possession of said currency, accused had explained that they received said currency note from some customer

In absence of any other evidence that accused themselves were responsible for preparation of said forged currency note, mere presentation of said counterfeit currency note, at the petrol pump, was not sufficient to prima facie make out offence under S.489-B, P.P.C.

Case of accused was of further inquiry and was covered by subsection (2) of S.497, Cr.P.C.

Accused were not previously involved in such-like cases

Accused were behind the bars and nothing was to be recovered from them

Bail could not be withheld as a punishment

Accused were released on bail. Muhammad Sarwar Awan with Maqsood Ahmad, S.-I. with record for the State.

Judgment & Decree

IJAZ AHMAD CHAUDHRY, J.

Through this application under section 497, Cr.P.C. the petitioners seek bail after arrest in case F.I.R. No.625 dated 3-9-2005 registered under section 489-B, P.P.C. at Police Station South Cantt. Lahore, on the statement of Ghulam Nabi.

2. The brief allegation in the F.I.R. is that on 3-9-2005 at 8-15 p.m. the petitioners came to the Petrol Pump while riding on motorcycle and asked for filling of petrol of Rs.50. The petitioners handed over a note of the denomination of Rs.500 which was counterfeit. The cashier namely Zafar Iqbal returned the note while declaring that it is counterfeit while the petitioners started making quarrel due to which the cashier again took back the note from them. The petitioner have committed the highhandedness by producing the counterfeit note and making quarrel.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated who received the currency note of Rs.500 from someone and when tried to make the payment of the Petrol Pump, this case has been falsely registered against them but there is no evidence that the petitioners have prepared this fake note. Affidavit has also been sworn by the complainant that the petitioners did not produce the note intentionally.

4. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand opposes this application.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record. The prosecution during investigation has failed to collect any evidence that this fake note was prepared by the petitioners and regarding the possession of the note it is being explained that they received the said note from some customer and further made the payment. In the absence of any other evidence that the petitioners themselves were responsible for the preparation of the said forged note, A mere presentation of the said counterfeit note at the Petrol Pump is not sufficient to prima facie make out the offence under section 489-B, P.P.C. Hence, the case of the petitioners is of further inquiry and is covered by subsection (2) of section 497, Cr.P.C. The petitioners are not previously involved in such-like cases, who are behind the bars and nothing is to be recovered from them. Bail cannot be withheld as a punishment. Hence, this application is accepted and the petitioners are allowed to be released on bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial/Illaqa Magistrate. H.B.T./N-24/L???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.