CLC 1981

1981 PLP 738 (CLC)

Raja MUHAMMAD SARWAR‑ — Appellant Versus Mst. MISRI JAN‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
8th April 1980
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 PLP 738 (CLC)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members N/A
Parties Raja MUHAMMAD SARWAR‑ — Appellant Versus Mst. MISRI JAN‑Respondent
Primary Law (a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 738 (CLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: (a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 738 (CLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 738 (CLC) (Raja MUHAMMAD SARWAR‑ — Appellant Versus Mst. MISRI JAN‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

Representation

  • Muhammad Iqbal Bhutta for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 13‑EvictionEvidence showing respondent not requiring dis puted premises for reconstruction but required amalgamation of two houses and reconstruction thereon and petition making out a clear case of personal need on reconstruction of house and not independent of same‑‑Appeal allowed.

Judgment & Decree

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑

S. 13‑EvictionEvidence showing respondent not requiring dis puted premises for reconstruction but required amalgamation of two houses and reconstruction thereon and petition making out a clear case of personal need on reconstruction of house and not independent of same‑‑Appeal allowed. (b) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑-- ‑‑ S. 14‑Res judicataFiling of second petition in eviction proceed ings on any fresh ground, held, would not be hit by principle of res judicata as contained under S. 14 of Ordinance.‑[Res judicata]. C. M. Latif Rawn for Appellant. Muhammad Iqbal Bhutta for Respondent. Dates of hearing : 7th and 8th April 1980.