1981 PLP 1148 (CLC)
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE‑Appellant Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KARACHI AND 10 others‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1148 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MINISTRY OF DEFENCE‑Appellant Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KARACHI AND 10 others‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | (a) Limitation Act (1X of 1908)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1148 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Limitation Act (1X of 1908)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1148 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1148 (CLC) (MINISTRY OF DEFENCE‑Appellant Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KARACHI AND 10 others‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Hassan Akbar for Respondent No. 1.
- Khuda Bakhsh Omrani and Mehar Hussain Mesawa for Respondents Nos. 2 to 11.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 5‑Limitation‑Condo nation of delay‑Contention that delay should be condoned because machinery of Government takes inordi nately longtime to make arrangements for filing cases‑Repelled-- Government in matter of condonation, held, cannot claim preferential treatment.‑‑[Condonation of delay].
S. 149 read with Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), S. 4 ‑Deficit court fee‑Party in default‑Held : Not entitled to exercise of discretion under S. 149, C. P. C.
Judgment & Decree
S. 5‑Limitation‑Condo nation of delay‑Contention that delay should be condoned because machinery of Government takes inordi nately longtime to make arrangements for filing cases‑Repelled-- Government in matter of condonation, held, cannot claim preferential treatment.‑‑[Condonation of delay]. Province of East Pakistan v. Abdul Hamid Darji and others 1970 S C M R 559 and Commissioner of Income‑tax v. Ravi Textile and Carpet Company 1968 SCMR115rel. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑
S. 149 read with Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), S. 4 ‑Deficit court fee‑Party in default‑Held : Not entitled to exercise of discretion under S. 149, C. P. C. Sadiqunnisa v. Khan Sahib Agha Muhammad Sultan Mirza and 8 others P L D 1972 Kar. 103 and H. H. S. Feldman v. The Province of East Pakistan P L D 1970 Kar. 296 ref. S. A. Hasnain for Appellant. Hassan Akbar for Respondent No. 1. Khuda Bakhsh Omrani and Mehar Hussain Mesawa for Respondents Nos. 2 to 11. Date of hearing : 10th March, 1980.