P L D 1981 Lahore 196 (1) (PLP)
LIAQUAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1981 Lahore 196 (1) (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | M. S. H. Qureshi, J |
| Parties | LIAQUAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1981 Lahore 196 (1) (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1981 Lahore 196 (1) (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: M. S. H. Qureshi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1981 Lahore 196 (1) (PLP) (LIAQUAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Mansoor Malik for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ 5. 498‑Bail, pre‑arrest‑Petitioner having been seen bringing an ox from Indian side of border‑Ox taken into custody while petitioner allegedly escaped‑Pre‑arrest bail confirmed, in circumstances. Sh. Maqbool Ahmad far the State
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner who was on interim pre-arrest bail allowed by the Special Judge, Customs, Lahore, failed to appear on 1-11-1980. His counsel Mr. Mansoor Malik was, however, present and informed the Court that the petitioner was ill. As no medical certificate had been produced, the learned Special Judge declined to extend the interim pre-arrest bail and rejected the application.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is of having been seen bringing an ox from the Indian side. The ox was taken into custody but the petitioner is stated to have escaped.
3. As the case property is already in the custody of the Police, I confirm the interim pre-arrest bail allowed to the petitioner by this Court. The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the Police. S. G. D. Petition allowed.