1991 PLP 387 (SCMR)
SHAUKAT HAYAT KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1991 PLP 387 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zillah, CJ. and Rustam S. Sidhwa, J |
| Parties | SHAUKAT HAYAT KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 387 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 387 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zillah, CJ. and Rustam S. Sidhwa, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 387 (SCMR) (SHAUKAT HAYAT KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Hakeem Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 27th February, 1990.
- Abdul Hakeem Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench, Abbottabad, dated 13-6-1989 in Civil Revision No.38 of 1.989).
Art. 185(3)
Leave to appeal was granted to consider as to why case should not be remanded for rehearing of revision petition by High' Court as a partial relief was granted to respondent in motion proceedings without notice to petitioners.
Judgment & Decree
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider as to why case should not be remanded for rehearing of revision petition by High' Court as a partial relief was granted to respondent in motion proceedings without notice to petitioners. Abdul Hakeem Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Manzoor Ilahi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 27th February, 1990. RUSTAM S. SIDHWA J.‑This is a petition by Shaukat Hayat Khan and others, petitioners, seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench, Abbottabad, dated 13‑6‑1989.
2. Arguments heard. Leave is granted to consider why the case should not be remanded for the re‑hearing of the revision petition by the Peshawar High Court as a partial relief was granted to the respondent‑Government in motion proceedings without notice to the petitioners. The petitioners shall furnish security in the sum of Rs.5,
000. The appeal shall be heard on the basis of the present record. The parties are at liberty to file such further documents as they consider necessary for the full and final disposal of the appeal. H.B.T./S‑525/S Leave granted.