PLD 1975

P L D 1975 Karachi 57 (PLP)

M. O. BASHA-Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, SIND LABOUR COURT III, KARACHI AND 5 OTHERS-RESPONDENTS

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Constitution Petition No. 1227 of 1973, decided on 4th April 1974.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Haleem and Ghulam Rasool K. Shaikh, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1975 Karachi 57 (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Muhammad Haleem and Ghulam Rasool K. Shaikh, JJ
Parties M. O. BASHA-Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, SIND LABOUR COURT III, KARACHI AND 5 OTHERS-RESPONDENTS
Primary Law (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), (a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1975 Karachi 57 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), (a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1975 Karachi 57 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem and Ghulam Rasool K. Shaikh, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1975 Karachi 57 (PLP) (M. O. BASHA-Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, SIND LABOUR COURT III, KARACHI AND 5 OTHERS-RESPONDENTS). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) (a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)

Representation

  • N. I. Mohdi for Petitioner.
  • M. H. Kazmi for Respondents Nos. 3 and 5.
  • Date of hearing : 2nd April 1974.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 36-D(i)--Appeal-Word "decision" in section-Not qualified by any word of limitation-Cannot be construed so as to mean a decision on merits-Interpretation of statutes-Words should be given ordinary meanings unless restricted by statute. Ss. 25-A & 36 B-Appeal-Dismissal of application under S. 25-A­ Means adjudication under S. 36-B and a final decision-Applicant could, in circumstance, have legal grievance and competent to go in appeal.

Judgment & Decree

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑ ‑‑ S. 36‑D(i)‑‑Appeal‑Word "decision" in section‑Not qualified by any word of limitationCannot be construed so as to mean a decision on meritsInterpretation of statutes‑Words should be given ordinary meanings unless restricted by statute. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑ Ss. 25‑A & 36 B‑AppealDismissal of application under S. 25‑A Means adjudication under S. 36‑B and a final decision‑Applicant could, in circumstance, have legal grievance and competent to go in appeal. N. I. Mohdi for Petitioner. M. H. Kazmi for Respondents Nos. 3 and

5. Date of hearing : 2nd April 1974.