1983 PLP 1051 (SCMR)
TAJ DIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL-Respondent
| Citation | 1983 PLP 1051 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and M. S. H, Quraishi, JJ |
| Parties | TAJ DIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 PLP 1051 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 PLP 1051 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and M. S. H, Quraishi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 PLP 1051 (SCMR) (TAJ DIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Quraishi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- S. M. Masood, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑The petition is converted into appeal and disposed of as follows. The counsel for the parties agree that status quo should be maintained in respect of the physical possession. But the person in possession either as owner or as a tenant of either party, shall deposit the landlord's share of the produce with the Tehsildar of the area. It is, therefore, ordered accordingly. The Tehsildar is directed to enforce the compliance with this order in case of default by any of the parties or persons in possession. He shall then invest the money so received by him in. Khan Deposits to be given to the party which ultimately succeeds. The order shall, however, not affect any other proceedings. M. Z. M. Order accordingly.