2008 PLP 312 (MLD)
ILYAS alias BILLU — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2008 PLP 312 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ILYAS alias BILLU — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2008 PLP 312 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2008 PLP 312 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2008 PLP 312 (MLD) (ILYAS alias BILLU — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S.426
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(c)
Petitioner/accused was sentenced only for live years, which was existed a short sentence
No likelihood existed of appeal being taken up in near future
Benefit of S.382-B, Cr.P.C. was also given to the petitioner
Conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioner was suspended till the final decision of his appeal.
Judgment & Decree
Through this application under section 426, Cr.P.C. the petitioner namely: Ilyas alias Billu seeks suspension of sentence, who was convicted under section 9-C of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 and sentenced to five years' R.I. with a fine of Rs.20,000 and in default of non-payment of fine, to further undergo six months' S.-I. by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Judge Special Court, Vehari, vide judgment, dated 28-4-2007, passed in case F.I.R. No. 300, dated 7-12-2005, offence under section 9-C ibid, registered with Police Station, Danewal. Benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. was also extended to the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states, that the sentence awarded to the petitioner is short and there is no likelihood of hearing of the petitioner's appeal in near future.
3. Conversely, learned State Counsel does not oppose this petition.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The petitioner was sentenced only for five years, which is a short sentence. Reliance is placed on Nazeer Ahmad and 2 others v. The State (2005 PCr.LJ 657 Karachi) and Abdul Hameed v. Muhammad Abdullah and others (1999 SCMR 2589). There is no likelihood of the appeal, being taken up in near future. Benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. was also given to the petitioner.
5. In this view of the matter, this petition under section 426, Cr.P.C. is accepted; the conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioner is suspended till the final decision of his appeal and he shall be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 (rupees one lac only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Bench Criminal Miscellaneous disposed of. H.B.T./I-49/L Sentence suspended.