SCMR 1989

1989SCMR678 (PLP)

ALI MUZAFFAR — Petitioner Versus Mst. AMTUL BEGUM and 3 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.262 of 1984, decided on 26th March, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989SCMR678 (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties ALI MUZAFFAR — Petitioner Versus Mst. AMTUL BEGUM and 3 others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR678 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR678 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR678 (PLP) (ALI MUZAFFAR — Petitioner Versus Mst. AMTUL BEGUM and 3 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Mirza Hafeez-ur-Rahman, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
  • Iqbal Ahmad Oureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Abdul Aziz Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.2.
  • Date of hearing: 26th March, 1988.
  • Mirza Hafeez‑ur‑Rahman, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Iqbal Ahmad Oureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Abdul Aziz Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.2.

Headnotes / Summary

(From the judgment dated 5-12-1983 of the Lahore High Court, in Civil Revision No.1675-D/83).

Art.199--Res judicata--Decision of High Court in Constitutional petition earlier brought by the petitioner operates as res judicata in subsequent civil proceedings.

Judgment & Decree

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ ‑‑‑Art.199‑‑Res judicata‑‑Decision of High Court in Constitutional petition earlier brought by the petitioner operates as res judicata in subsequent civil proceedings. Mirza Hafeez‑ur‑Rahman, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Iqbal Ahmad Oureshi, Advocate Supreme Court and Abdul Aziz Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.2. Date of hearing: 26th March, 1988. SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑In this petition for special leave to appeal the High Court has affirmed the finding of the Additional District Judge and the trial Court that the decision of the High Court in a writ petition earlier brought by the petitioner himself operated as res judicata in this case. After hearing the learned " counsel, we are not persuaded that the said finding suffers from any infirmity. Leave to appeal is refused. M.B.A./A‑412/S Petition dismissed.