1984 PLP 2200 (CLC)
Mst. SURRAYA BIBI‑Appellant Versus SHER MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHL1‑Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 2200 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Mst. SURRAYA BIBI‑Appellant Versus SHER MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHL1‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 2200 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 2200 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 2200 (CLC) (Mst. SURRAYA BIBI‑Appellant Versus SHER MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHL1‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- M.R. Khalid for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
‑ S. 25‑A‑Custody of minor‑Transfer of case‑Mother and minor residing at and matter in dispute pending before Judge Family Court at P, father opposing transfer application on ground that case has been pending for nearly two years and no inconvenience caused to mother earlier‑Proceedings not gone beyond framing of issues‑Order for production of minor already passed and incon venience to mother and minor starting now‑Transfer of case ordered, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Transfer Application No. 16 of 1983, decided on 25th April, 1983.
‑ S. 25‑A‑Custody of minor‑Transfer of case‑Mother and minor residing at and matter in dispute pending before Judge Family Court at P, father opposing transfer application on ground that case has been pending for nearly two years and no inconvenience caused to mother earlier‑Proceedings not gone beyond framing of issues‑Order for production of minor already passed and incon venience to mother and minor starting now‑Transfer of case ordered, in circumstances. Syed Kabir Mahmood for Applicant. M.R. Khalid for Respondents. Date of hearing : 25th April, 1983. The petitioner seeks the transfer of a case relating to the custody of the minor which is pending at Pakpattan to Burewala where she and the minor reside. The respondent opposes the transfer on the ground that the case has been pending for nearly two years and no inconvenience has been caused to the petitioner, earlier, and therefore, the petition should be rejected. I, on the other hand, find that the proceedings in the case have not gone beyond the framing of issues so far. The inconvenience to the petitioner and to the children for whose production, according to the learned counsel, an order has already been passed, starts now and the proceedings of the past two years cannot be relied upon by the respondent. The respondent, however, f has urged that the case may not be sent to Burewala because the respondent apprehends harm at the hands of the relatives of the present petitioner who are living in Burewala. The parties have agreed that Vehari will be suitable place and convenient to both the parties. It is, therefore, directed that the case pending in the Court of Judge Family Court Pakpattan is trans ferred and be entrusted to a Judge Family Court at Vehari. M.Y.M Case transferred.