1988 PLP (1) (CLC)
THE CHAIRMAN, KARACHI WATER AND SWERAGE BOARD and others‑‑petitioners Versus VITH SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, (SOUTH), KARACHI and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1988 PLP (1) (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Abdul Razzak .A Thahim, JJ |
| Parties | THE CHAIRMAN, KARACHI WATER AND SWERAGE BOARD and others‑‑petitioners Versus VITH SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, (SOUTH), KARACHI and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan ‑ (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP (1) (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan ‑ (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP (1) (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Zahoorul Haq and Abdul Razzak .A Thahim, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP (1) (CLC) (THE CHAIRMAN, KARACHI WATER AND SWERAGE BOARD and others‑‑petitioners Versus VITH SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, (SOUTH), KARACHI and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Hussain M.Paryani for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.115‑‑Constitutional petition, competency of‑‑Constitutional petition against order of Senior Civil Judge asking petitioner to appear in person in pursuance of an application for contempt . of Court filed against him, held, was incompetent as submission made by petitioner in constitutional petition could easily be made by him before Single Judge of High Court under S.115, C.P.C.
Judgment & Decree
MUMAMMAD ZAHOORUL HAQ, J.‑‑The petitioner has felt aggrieved against the order issued by Senior Civil Judge asking the petitioner to appear in person in pursuance of an application for contempt of Court filed against him by respondent Wazir Hyder. Mr. Paryani has submitted that the notice should not have been issued without calling upon the petitioner to show cause against the same. He further contends that initially injunction issued against the petitioner in respect of the transfer of the respondent Wazir Hayat was not within the jurisdiction of the Civil Court. We are afraid that all the submissions' can easily be made by the petitioner before Single Judge of this Court under section 115 of C.P.C. where the petitioner can get adequate relief, therefore, this petition is incompetent and is hereby dismissed in limine. The Miscellaneous application is also dismissed. H . B . T . / C‑43 / K Petition dismissed.