YLR 2012

2012 PLP 1918 (YLR)

Mst. AAISHA alias USHA and another — Petitioners Versus BANJE RAM and 8 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Sindh
Decided Date
Constitution Petition No.D-391 of 2012, decided on 10th April, 2012.
Honorable Judges
Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Muhammad Tasnim, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2012 PLP 1918 (YLR)
Forum / Court Sindh
Bench Members Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Muhammad Tasnim, JJ
Parties Mst. AAISHA alias USHA and another — Petitioners Versus BANJE RAM and 8 others — Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 PLP 1918 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 PLP 1918 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Muhammad Tasnim, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 PLP 1918 (YLR) (Mst. AAISHA alias USHA and another — Petitioners Versus BANJE RAM and 8 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan

Representation

  • Rao Faisal for Petitioners along with Petitioners in person.
  • Allah Bachayo Soomro A.G. Sindh along with Inspector Ali Muhammad Khoso, S.H.O. Police Station Chhachhro for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 199

Constitutional petition

Petitioner who was Hindu sought protection against harassment by her relatives after embracing Islam and contracting marriage with Muslim boy

Petitioner girl recited Kalma-e-Tayyab in court and stated that she being sui juris and after embracing Islam, had contracted marriage with the other petitioner out of free-will and that she had not been abducted by anyone

High Court directed the concerned SHO police to provide protection to the girl and observed that she was at liberty to go with her husband and live her life as per her own choice and free-will

Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.

Judgment & Decree

Through instant petition the petitioners have sought protection as they apprehend danger at the hands of respondents. Notices were issued to the respondents, pursuant to which, S.H.O. Police Station Chhachhro is present in Court. Learned Additional A.G. files comments on behalf of respondents Nos.7 to 9 which are taken on record. S.H.O. present in Court states that no F.I.R. has been registered against the petitioner No.2 in respect of marriage or abduction of petitioner Mst. Aaisha alias Usha. Petitioner Mst. Aaisha alias Usha present in court recited Kalma-e-tayyab and stated that she being sui juris having embraced Islam has contracted Marriage with petitioner No.2 namely Yar Muhammad son of Qadir Bux, out of her own free-will and without any pressure or coercion from any corner, which has antagonized her relatives who are causing harassment. She has further stated that she was never married before embracing Islam or contracting the marriage. She further states that she has not been abducted by any one including respondent No.2, whereas she wants to go and live with her husband namely Yar Muhammad who is present in Court. Keeping in view hereinabove facts and the statement of petitioner No. 1 she is set at liberty to go along with her husband i.e. the petitioner No.2 and live her, life as per her own choice and free-will. Concerned SI7.10 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners as per law. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. K.M.Z./A-45/K Order accordingly.