PLD 1959

P L D 1959 (W (PLP)

Mst. SAID BEGUM and others‑Petitioners Versus ABBAS ALI and another‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Revision Side No. 334;of 1957‑58, decided on 9th March 1959, District Gujranwala.
Honorable Judges
M. Z. Khan, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1959 (W (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members M. Z. Khan, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Parties Mst. SAID BEGUM and others‑Petitioners Versus ABBAS ALI and another‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1959 (W (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1959 (W (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: M. Z. Khan, Member Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1959 (W (PLP) (Mst. SAID BEGUM and others‑Petitioners Versus ABBAS ALI and another‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Raja Hassan Akhter for Petitioners.
  • Khawaja Abdur Rahim and Ch. Ghulam Ali Alvi for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

RevisionFinding of fact based on material on record‑Finding not unreasonable‑No illegality or material irregularity‑Not interfered with.

Judgment & Decree

Mst. Nur Begum, widow of Ahmed Shah, died on 5‑7‑

54. At the time of Ahmed Shah's death, his brother Jiwan Shah and sister, Mst. Sattan, were alive. Hussain Shah is the brother of Mst. Nur Begum and is still alive. Jiwan Shah has died leaving one son, Sardar Ali, and one daughter, Mst. Nur Begum. On Mst Nur Begum's death two points were disputed. One was whether Abbas Ali is the son of Mst. Sattan Bibi from Elahi Shah and whether Nur Begum widow of Ahmed Shah was a Shia or a Sunni The only point urged before me at the time of ,arguments was whether Abbas Ali is the son of Mst. Sattan, daughter of Syed Amir and widow of Elahi Shah. A mass of evidence, both oral and documentary was pro duced. Both the Collector and the Commissioner have come to tae concurrent finding that Abbas Ali is the son of Mst. Sattan, daughter of Amir. This finding cannot be called unreasonable in view of the fact that there is material to support it e.g., in the birth register Abbas Ali's date of birth is given as 25‑5‑1908, whereas Sattan daughter of Daim, is stated to have married as a virgin on 24‑11‑1915. Under these circumstances I de not find any illegality or material irregularity which has occasioned a failure of justice in the present case and so there is no ground for interference. The result is that the petition is dismissed. K. M. A. Petition dismissed.