1989 PLP (2) (MLD)
AL‑TRADICO ENTERPRISES‑‑Petitioner Versus EXPORT PROMOTION BUREAU and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP (2) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Sajjad Ali Shah and Muhammad Mazhar Ali, JJ |
| Parties | AL‑TRADICO ENTERPRISES‑‑Petitioner Versus EXPORT PROMOTION BUREAU and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP (2) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP (2) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah and Muhammad Mazhar Ali, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP (2) (MLD) (AL‑TRADICO ENTERPRISES‑‑Petitioner Versus EXPORT PROMOTION BUREAU and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- NA. Farooqui and Andalib Alvi for Petitioner.
- Abul Khair Ansari for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Petition disposed of in terms of assurance given by respondent for redress of petitioner's grievances.
Judgment & Decree
SAJJAD ALI SHAH, J.‑‑Main grievance of the petitioner is that policy laid down for release of quota with regard to the export of items in category 20 on the basis of 90% for past performance and 10% for new entrance is not being followed in letter and spirit as such due quota of new entrant is affected and their share is reduced to their disadvantage. It has been pointed out that in the comments submitted by respondent No. 1 in paragraphs 19 to 22 admission has been made which is reproduced as under:‑ "The manner of verification suggested by the petitioners, namely checking against ships' manifests, ships' agents and against arrivals in importing countries can be examined on its merits. In fact, verification against arrivals in importing countries is already being done in the case of new EEC restraint Category 20 (Bed Linen) and can also be done for the new USA/MMF categories. However, this would be a long and time consuming process. Half of the quota year 1987 has already elapsed, and devoting more time for further verification, as suggested by the petitioner, would only delay the utilisation of the relevant quotas for the new restraint categories." Mr. Suri has further stated and assured that further steps would be taken to act on the suggestions and in that connection relevant information would be sought from the USA and in that respect assistance from the petitioner would also be welcome and this information could be relied upon from the next year. A On the basis of this statement Mr. Naseem Faruqui says that he is satisfied. In the circumstances, petition is disposed of in the terms of assurance given by Mr. K.K. Suri, Director, Export Promotion Bureau, Karachi. H.B.T./A‑486/K Order accordingly.