2002 PLP 899 (SCMR)
Haji KHAN LASHARI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2002 PLP 899 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Nazim Hussain Siddiqui and Hamid Ali Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | Haji KHAN LASHARI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 899 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 899 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nazim Hussain Siddiqui and Hamid Ali Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 899 (SCMR) (Haji KHAN LASHARI and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- A.A. Siddiqui, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
NAZIM HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI, J.‑‑
This order will dispose of Petitions Nos.575 to 685 and 697 to 701‑K of 2000 as common questions are involved in these matters. The petitioners were employees of Pakistan Steel Mills and their services, en bloc, were terminated on 1‑2‑2000. They approached Management of the respondents and a Review Committee was constituted, which gave them interim relief in the way that they were allowed ad hoc salaries up to May, 2000. Thereafter, they approached Federal Service Tribunal for redress of their grievance. The Tribunal admitted their appeals, but declined any interim relief and fixed the matter for hearing on 16‑4‑2000, which date later on was changed to 18‑1‑2001. Against above order, the petitioners have approached this Court. It is pertinent to point out here that in a similar petition (C.P.L.C. No. 427‑K of 2000) this Court, by consent, had passed an order whereby interim relief was granted to petitioner Pasha Ahmed Gut with regard to payment of ad ho salary and the petition was disposed of in terms thereof. . The petitioners contend that similar relief be allowed to them as was given to said Pasha Ahmed Gul. Learned counsel for the respondents has vehemently opposed above plea. and stated that the prosecution are not willing to extend said concession to the petitioners and that even the respondents have filed a review petition for withdrawal of said order. It was a consent order and since the respondents are not willing to consent in these petitions; the relief given to said Pasha Ahmed Gul cannot be given to these petitions. Order accordingly. It is an admitted position that the final dues of the petitioners are lying with the respondents and they are entitled to receive said dues, subject to completion of legal formalities, without prejudice to any of their legal rights, they will be entitled to drawback their final dues from the respondents who shall pay the same to them as early as possible. The appeals of the petitioners are already fixed before Federal Service Tribunal on 18th January, 2001, which may be disposed of on that particular date or on subsequent ate not later than three weeks thereafter. In above terms, the petitions stand disposed of. Q.M.H./M.A.K./K‑46/S ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????? Order accordingly.