2007 PLP 278 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD ILYAS — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE RAMAY — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 278 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mian Saqib Nisar, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ILYAS — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE RAMAY — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 278 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 278 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Saqib Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 278 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD ILYAS — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE RAMAY — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Petitioner.
- Mirza Javed Mukhtar for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
O.XXXVII, R.2
Suit upon negotiable instrument i.e. cheque
Counsel for the parties had no objection, if the suit for cancellation of the cheques, filed by the petitioner pending before Civil Court, was withdrawn from that Court and was entrusted to the Court of Add: District Judge; where suit under O.XXXVII, R.2, C.P.C. filed by respondent for recovery of amount on the basis of same cheque was pending
District Judge concerned, was directed to consolidate both the suits and proceedings would be conducted in the suit filed by respondent
Petitioner would have full opportunity to produce his evidence according to law.
Judgment & Decree
MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J.--Learned counsel for the parties have no objection, if the suit for cancellation of the cheques, filed by the petitioner, pending before the learned Civil Judge at Ahmadpur Sharqia, District Bahawalpur, is withdrawn from that Court and is entrusted to the Court of learned Addl. District Judge, Gujranwala, where the suit under Order XXXVII, rule 2, C.P.C. filed by the respondent, for the recovery of the amount on the basis of the same cheques, is pending. The learned District Judge, Gujranwala, is directed to consolidate both the cases, and the proceedings shall be conducted in the suit, filed by the respondent, and if the respondent has already led any evidence in the suit, he may rely upon the same or give some further evidence, after the consolidation; thereafter, the petitioner shall have the full opportunity to produce his evidence according to the law. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Addl. District Judge, Gujranwala, on the date already fixed before him. Disposed of. H.B.T./M-636/L Order accordingly.