2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
NASIRA ABDUL GHANI Versus EDO (EDU) and others
| Citation | 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Tanvir Ahmed Khan and Falak Sher, JJ |
| Parties | NASIRA ABDUL GHANI Versus EDO (EDU) and others |
| Primary Law | Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Tanvir Ahmed Khan and Falak Sher, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (NASIRA ABDUL GHANI Versus EDO (EDU) and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhstaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent No.4.
- Khalid Yaseen Khan, EDO Narowal for Respondent No. 1.
- Syed Iftikhar Hussain Najam, Prof. Director Admn. for Respondent No. 3.
- Date of hearing: 24th November, 2003.
- Pervaiz Inayat Malik, Advocate Supreme Court and Mr. Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record for, Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 12-3-2003 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal in Service Appeal No.513 of 2003).
S. 4
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)
Service Tribunal accepted appeal
Factum of non-providing opportunity of hearing to respondent by Tribunal not denied by appellant
Supreme Court accepted appeal, set aside impugned judgment, resultantly appeal would be deemed to be pending before Tribunal for its decision after affording opportunity of hearing to parties. Pervaiz Inayat Malik, Advocate Supreme Court and Mr. Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record for, Petitioner.
Judgment & Decree
S. 4
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)
Service Tribunal accepted appeal
Factum of non-providing opportunity of hearing to respondent by Tribunal not denied by appellant
Supreme Court accepted appeal, set aside impugned judgment, resultantly appeal would be deemed to be pending before Tribunal for its decision after affording opportunity of hearing to parties. Pervaiz Inayat Malik, Advocate Supreme Court and Mr. Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record for, Petitioner. Ch. Muhstaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondent No.4. Khalid Yaseen Khan, EDO Narowal for Respondent No.
1. Syed Iftikhar Hussain Najam, Prof. Director Admn. for Respondent No.
3. Date of hearing: 24th November, 2003. FALAK SHER, J.,
Aggrieved by the granting of respondent Mst. Khushnood Akhtar's appeal by the learned Chairman Punjab Service Tribunal, directed against her transfer remanding the case to DPI (EE) Punjab on 12-3-2003, who consequently accorded her request on 9-6-2003, has recoursed to the captioned petition for leave to appeal primarily contending lack of hearing; factum whereof remained uncontroverted by the learned, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. In view whereof with the consent of the parties converting the petition into appeal is allowed, the impugned order is set-aside and the matter would be deemed to be pending before the learned Chairman for adjudication thereof in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. S.A.K./N-4/S Case remanded.