2009 PLP 318 (MLD)
QAMAR SULTANA and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others — Respondents
| Citation | 2009 PLP 318 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | QAMAR SULTANA and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 318 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 318 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 318 (MLD) (QAMAR SULTANA and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shaukat Ali Shaikh for Petitioners.
- Khursheed Anwar Kazi for Respondents.
- MUSHIR ALAM, J.---Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, Advocate for CDGK along with Mr. Nizami, D.D.O. Revenue present in Court along with cheques for Noor Muhammad Khatri petitioner No.8, Muhammad Ali Irfan petitioner No.9, Mst. Chaman Ara Begum petitioner No.18, Ghulam Ahmed Khan petitioner No.24, Muhammad Hamid petitioner No.31 and Abdul Ghaffar petitioner No.32. He further states that payments have already been made to the petitioners-Qamar Sultana petitioner No.1, Rahmat Bano petitioner No.2, Nazir Ahmed petitioner No.3, Ch. Muhammad Mehdi petitioner No.4, Major Jehangir Akhtar petitioner No.5, Ch. Muhammad Muzaffar petitioner No,6, Haji Essa Bhai Kabra petitioner No.7, Syed Mumtaz Hussain petitioner No.11, Mst. Aisha petitioner No.13, Saeeduddin Nomani petitioner No.16, Anirur Rehman petitioner No.17, Haleem Bai petitioner No.20, Mrs. Agnis Saleem petitioner No.22, Amna Aziz, Khatoon petitioner No.23, Shakeel Ahmed petitioner No.26, Muhammad Zaki Chawala petitioner No.29, Mst. Kishawar Sultana petitioner No.30, Zakria Rahman petitioner No.33 leaving only 9 petitioners to be-settled. As regard remaining 9 petitioners, it is stated that petitioner No.21 Syed Arshad Ali has already been paid three compensations thus 8 unsettled. Mr. Manzoor states out of 8 petitioners 5 petitioners shall be paid within seven (7) days and the three remaining whose houses have come under alignment, as and when their construction or possession is disturbed shall be paid. In case petitioners do not receive the amount from the D.D.O. Revenue present in Court within two weeks from today same shall be deposited with the Nazir of this Court to avoid dispute or controversy in this regard. Since purpose and intent of this application is served, application is accordingly disposed of.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 199
Constitutional petition
Compensation, payment of
Counsel for City District Government presented cheques of 24 petitioners, leaving only 9 petitioners to be settled and stated that one petitioner had already been paid three compensations, thus 8 remained unsettled
Counsel had stated that out of remaining 8 petitioners, 5 petitioners would be paid within 7 days and the three remaining, whose houses had come under alignment, as and when their construction or possession was distributed, would be paid and in case petitioners did not receive the amount, within specified period, same would be deposited with the Nazir of the High Court to avoid dispute or controversy in that regard
Purpose and intent of the constitutional petition having been served, same was disposed of accordingly--Petitioners, could, however, if aggrieved by the quantum of compensation agitate the same before the competent Authority.
Judgment & Decree
MUSHIR ALAM, J.
Mr. Manzoor Ahmed, Advocate for CDGK along with Mr. Nizami, D.D.O. Revenue present in Court along with cheques for Noor Muhammad Khatri petitioner No.8, Muhammad Ali Irfan petitioner No.9, Mst. Chaman Ara Begum petitioner No.18, Ghulam Ahmed Khan petitioner No.24, Muhammad Hamid petitioner No.31 and Abdul Ghaffar petitioner No.32. He further states that payments have already been made to the petitioners-Qamar Sultana petitioner No.1, Rahmat Bano petitioner No.2, Nazir Ahmed petitioner No.3, Ch. Muhammad Mehdi petitioner No.4, Major Jehangir Akhtar petitioner No.5, Ch. Muhammad Muzaffar petitioner No,6, Haji Essa Bhai Kabra petitioner No.7, Syed Mumtaz Hussain petitioner No.11, Mst. Aisha petitioner No.13, Saeeduddin Nomani petitioner No.16, Anirur Rehman petitioner No.17, Haleem Bai petitioner No.20, Mrs. Agnis Saleem petitioner No.22, Amna Aziz, Khatoon petitioner No.23, Shakeel Ahmed petitioner No.26, Muhammad Zaki Chawala petitioner No.29, Mst. Kishawar Sultana petitioner No.30, Zakria Rahman petitioner No.33 leaving only 9 petitioners to be-settled. As regard remaining 9 petitioners, it is stated that petitioner No.21 Syed Arshad Ali has already been paid three compensations thus 8 unsettled. Mr. Manzoor states out of 8 petitioners 5 petitioners shall be paid within seven (7) days and the three remaining whose houses have come under alignment, as and when their construction or possession is disturbed shall be paid. In case petitioners do not receive the amount from the D.D.O. Revenue present in Court within two weeks from today same shall be deposited with the Nazir of this Court to avoid dispute or controversy in this regard. Since purpose and intent of this application is served, application is accordingly disposed of. Petitioner may, however, if aggrieved by the quantum of compensation may agitate the same before the Competent Authority. H.B.T./Q-21/K??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.