PCRLJ 1992

1992 P Cr (PLP)

SHER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
1987-February-10
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties SHER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 P Cr (PLP) (SHER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497

Penal Code (XIN of 1860), S 307/34

Bail, grant of-- that blows were exchanged in a sudden quarrel between the parties and the offence if any would not fall under S.307. P.P.C. or even under S.326, P.P.C.

Prosecution did not oppose bail application as complainant had stated in F.I.R. that he had first struck one of the accused and he was given blows in retaliation

Counter-complaint had also been filed in the case

Accused were granted bail in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Bail Application No. 120 of 1987, decided on 10th February, 1987.

S. 497

Penal Code (XIN of 1860), S 307/34

Bail, grant of-- that blows were exchanged in a sudden quarrel between the parties and the offence if any would not fall under S.307. P.P.C. or even under S.326, P.P.C.

Prosecution did not oppose bail application as complainant had stated in F.I.R. that he had first struck one of the accused and he was given blows in retaliation

Counter-complaint had also been filed in the case

Accused were granted bail in circumstances. Sheikh Ghulam Sabir Niazi for Applicants. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Asstt. A: G. for the State. Both the applicants have been challaned in the Session Court Karachi (South) to stand trial for an offence, punishable under section 307/34, P.P.C. It is alleged that they assaulted the complainant Abdur Rehman and struck him by means of Razor and an Iron Rod due to quarrel over drawing of water from `Sabil' on 2-11-1986. Their application in the Sessions Court was dismissed by learned Sessions Judge by order, dated 4-12-1986 on the ground that one of the injuries cause to the complainant was certified to be grievous. The learned counsel for the applicants has urged that there was a "sudden quarrel between the parties and blows were exchanged and the offence, if at all, any, would not fall under section 307, P.P.C. or even under section 326, P.P.C. The learned A.A.-G. does not oppose the application in view of the fact that the complainant had stated in the F.I.R. that he had first struck the applicant Sher Muhammad and he was given blows in retaliation. Counter complainant also has been filed. Bail is granted in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety to each of the applicants. Surety to be furnished before the Session Judge, Karachi (South) N.H.Q./S-805/K Bail granted