2002 PLP 710 (YLR)
MUHAMMAD ANWAR BAJWA and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 710 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | M. A. Shahid Siddiqui, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ANWAR BAJWA and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 710 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 710 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: M. A. Shahid Siddiqui, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 710 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD ANWAR BAJWA and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Aftab Mustafa for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S.498‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 380/457‑‑‑Interim bail, confirmation of‑‑ Accused was real brother of complainant and there was a serious dispute between parties relating to ancestral property and civil and criminal cases were pending between them‑‑‑False implication, of accused, in circumstances, could not be ruled out‑‑‑Interim bail granted earlier, was confirmed. Asif Jalil for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S.498‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 380/457‑‑‑Interim bail, confirmation of‑‑ Accused was real brother of complainant and there was a serious dispute between parties relating to ancestral property and civil and criminal cases were pending between them‑‑‑False implication, of accused, in circumstances, could not be ruled out‑‑‑Interim bail granted earlier, was confirmed. Aftab Mustafa for Petitioners. Asif Jalil for the State. Muhammad Anwar Bajwa, Navid Anwar and Muhammad Bashir, petitioners, have applied for bail before arrest in a case under sections. 457 and 380, P.P.C., registered at Police Station Shad Bagh, Lahore, vide F.I.R. No.565 of 2000, dated 6‑12‑2000.
2. According to the F. I. R., Muhammad Younas (complainant) had gone to attend the marriage ceremony, of the daughter of his maternal uncle alongwith his family members. When he returned to his house on 24‑11‑2000, he found his household articles scattered and the locks broken. Certain house hold articles, the description of which is given in the F.I.R., were found missing. Muhammad Younas, while reporting the incident to the police on 6‑12‑2000, suspected the present petitioners for the offence.
3. Muhammad Anwar, petitioner happens to be the real brother or Muhammad Younas (complainant). He had earlier lodged a criminal case against the complainant besides obtaining an ex parte decree from the civil Court on 17‑9‑1999. According to the conclusion drawn by the Investigating Officer, there is a serious dispute between the parties relating to ancestral property.
4. In this view of the matter, the false implication of the petitioners cannot be ruled out, therefore, they are admitted to bail before arrest. The interim bail granted earlier is hereby confirmed. N.H.Q./M‑1160/L Interim bail confirmed.