1981 PLP 596 (CLC)
MIJHAMMAD YOUSUF AND 5 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus ADAM ALI AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 596 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J |
| Parties | MIJHAMMAD YOUSUF AND 5 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus ADAM ALI AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 596 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 596 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 596 (CLC) (MIJHAMMAD YOUSUF AND 5 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus ADAM ALI AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Abdul Matin for Appellants.
- A. K. M. Idris for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 10th February 190:x.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑ S. 13‑Subletting ‑ Eviction ‑ Tenant forming a new partner ship‑Tenancy rights in premises in suit kept reserved for benefit of tenant in spite of partnership firm carrying on business in disputed premises ‑ Entering into such partnership‑Held, cannot amount to parting with possession of premises in question so as to invite penal consequences on ground of subletting‑Mere use of immovable property by a partnership firm, held further, no guarantee for correctness of inference of property belonging to partnership firm,‑[Partnership]. Khuda Bux v. Syed Badrul Hassan P L D 1968f IKar. 667 and Mvlik Muhammad Ishaq v. Messrs Eroze Theatre P L D 1973 Kar. 522 rel.
Judgment & Decree
Second Appeal No. 102 of 1974, decided on 16th February 1980. ‑‑‑ S. 13‑Subletting ‑ Eviction ‑ Tenant forming a new partner ship‑Tenancy rights in premises in suit kept reserved for benefit of tenant in spite of partnership firm carrying on business in disputed premises ‑ Entering into such partnership‑Held, cannot amount to parting with possession of premises in question so as to invite penal consequences on ground of subletting‑Mere use of immovable property by a partnership firm, held further, no guarantee for correctness of inference of property belonging to partnership firm,‑[Partnership]. Khuda Bux v. Syed Badrul Hassan P L D 1968f IKar. 667 and Mvlik Muhammad Ishaq v. Messrs Eroze Theatre P L D 1973 Kar. 522 rel. Abdul Matin for Appellants. A. K. M. Idris for Respondents. Date of hearing : 10th February 190:x.