1999CLC 1819 (PLP)
Mst. SHAZIA PARVEEN‑‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1999CLC 1819 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mian Allah Nawaz, J |
| Parties | Mst. SHAZIA PARVEEN‑‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1999CLC 1819 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1999CLC 1819 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mian Allah Nawaz, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1999CLC 1819 (PLP) (Mst. SHAZIA PARVEEN‑‑‑Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 25‑A‑‑‑Transfer of suit‑‑‑Suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by husband against wife in Family Court at place "S" was sought to be transferred in Family Court at place "F" where suit for dissolution of marriage filed by wife against husband was pending‑‑‑Husband having no objection to transfer of his suit, as prayed for by wife suit was transferred accordingly and in view of fear of life at place "F" as entertained by husband, direction was given to police to give protection to husband when he would go to place "F" to appear in the Court. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Applicant.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 25‑A‑‑‑Transfer of suit‑‑‑Suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by husband against wife in Family Court at place "S" was sought to be transferred in Family Court at place "F" where suit for dissolution of marriage filed by wife against husband was pending‑‑‑Husband having no objection to transfer of his suit, as prayed for by wife suit was transferred accordingly and in view of fear of life at place "F" as entertained by husband, direction was given to police to give protection to husband when he would go to place "F" to appear in the Court. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Applicant. Statediy, Mst. Sha/.ia hcrveen and Muhammad Akram were married in v ear 1992. l lowcvcr, the relationship between the. two became strained and so the applicant'Mst. Shazia Parveen came to the house of her parents _uld filed .,uii for dissolution of marriage in the Court of Mr. Habib‑ur‑Rehman, Senior Civil ,fudge/Judge. Family Court, Faisalabad. Respondent also did not lag behind and filed a suit fur rcstitutton of conjugal rights in the C‑'curt of Shaukat Ali, Civil judge/Judge, Family Court, Sialko; This is how this petition has come to this Court.
2. Muhammad Akram/respondent who is present in person, he has no exception to this application. The conduct shown by him is highly appreciable. I With the consent of the parties, this application is allowed with the result that suit for restitution of conjugal rights filed by respondent is withdrawn from the Court of Mr. Shaukat Ali, Civil Judge/Judge, Family Court, Sialkot and is assigned to learned Senior Civil Judge/Judge, Family Court, Faisalabad. The first Court shall send the record to transferee Court as quickly as possible. The parties have undertaken to appear before the Judge, Family Court, Faisalabad on 16‑11‑1998. The learned Senior Civil Judge/Judge, Family Court, Faisalabad will ensure that the proper opportunity is given to the parties to have a reconciliation by holding pre and post‑conciliation proceedings objectively. This, however, will not preclude him from deciding the suit on merit if pre‑conciliation proceedings and post conciliation proceedings fail. The respondent, who is present in person, states that he entertains fear of life at Faisalabad. Copy of the order be sent to S.S.P., Faisalabad with a direction that protection be given to respondent when he goes to Faisalabad to appear in Court. This petition, so, stands disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./S‑267/L Order accordingly