1990 PLP 285 (SCMR)
THE STATE‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL SATTAR and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 285 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Ghulam Mujaddid |
| Parties | THE STATE‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL SATTAR and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 285 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 285 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Ghulam Mujaddid.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 285 (SCMR) (THE STATE‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL SATTAR and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Akhtar, Additional Advocate‑General and Faiz Muhammad Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 19th June, 1989.
- We have heard the Additional Advocate‑General who appeared on behalf of the State. He has not been able to point out any error of law, mis‑reading or' non‑reading of evidence which would justify interference in the impugned order
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Lahore High Court, dated 12‑3‑1988 in Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 88). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑Petition against dismissal of appeal against acquittal‑‑‑State could not point out any error of law, misreading or non‑reading of evidence justifying interference in the impugned order‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑Petition against dismissal of appeal against acquittal‑‑‑State could not point out any error of law, misreading or non‑reading of evidence justifying interference in the impugned order‑‑‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed. Muhammad Akhtar, Additional Advocate‑General and Faiz Muhammad Bhatti, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 19th June, 1989. GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑The State has filed this petition for leave to appeal against the order of the Lahore High Court dated 12‑3‑1988 whereby the State appeal against the acquittal of Abdul Sattar and Abdul Razzaq respondents by the trial Court vide judgment dated 26‑12‑1987 was dismissed in limine. We have heard the Additional Advocate‑General who appeared on behalf of the State. He has not been able to point out any error of law, mis‑reading or' non‑reading of evidence which would justify interference in the impugned order No case is made out for leave to appeal. The petition is dismissed. M.A.K./S‑432/S Petition dismissed.