PLD 1952

P L D (Rev (PLP)

SARGODHA‑BHERA BUS SERVICE, SARGODHA -Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LAHOLE -Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
1952-June-5
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D (Rev (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties SARGODHA‑BHERA BUS SERVICE, SARGODHA -Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LAHOLE -Respondent
Primary Law Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D (Rev (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D (Rev (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D (Rev (PLP) (SARGODHA‑BHERA BUS SERVICE, SARGODHA -Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LAHOLE -Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940

Representation

  • Secretary Regional Transport Authority for Respondent.

Headnotes / Summary

‑Corridor restriction on picking of Passengers‑No legal bar against.

Judgment & Decree

AKHTER HUSSAIN, F. C.‑This is an appeal by the Sargodha‑Bhera Bus Service, Sargodha against Resolution No. 29 passed by the Regional Transport Authority, Lahore on 20th August 1951, by which they allowed the Sargodha Bhera Bus Service, Sargodha to operate on the new route vii. Bhalwal‑Sargodha via Mari Lak subject to the corridor restriction that while proceeding from Sargodha to Bhera no passenger will be picked up for Bhalwal or from any place between Sargodha and Bhalwal and that on return journey also no passengerwill be picked up at Bhalwal or at any place between Bhalwal and Sargodha. It has been argued on behalf of the appellant that the corridor restriction mentioned above has made the service uneconomic and that the imposition of the restriction is hard. There is no legal bar on the imposition of the corridor restrictions. I would, however, on equitable grounds amend this restriction to the extent that the Sargodha‑Bhera Bus Service Sargodha, will not pick up passengers in any place between Sargodha‑Bhalwal but will be allowed to pick up passengers at Sargodha and Bhalwal for places between Bhalwa and, Bhera and for Sargodha. The appeal is accepted to this extent. Announced. A. H. Appeal partly accepted.