1991 PLP 2190 (MLD)
RAMZAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1991 PLP 2190 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | RAMZAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 2190 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 2190 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 2190 (MLD) (RAMZAN and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Abdus Salam for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S, 561-A
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.392/34
Quashing of proceedings-- Complainant had submitted that parties had compromised and as such complainant did not desire to pursue the complaint filed by him and he also did not intend to produce any evidence
State counsel in view of compromise between the parties did not oppose application of complainant for quashing of proceedings
Compromise between parties being recognised ground for quashing of proceedings, application as such was accepted.
Judgment & Decree
S, 561-A
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.392/34
Quashing of proceedings-- Complainant had submitted that parties had compromised and as such complainant did not desire to pursue the complaint filed by him and he also did not intend to produce any evidence
State counsel in view of compromise between the parties did not oppose application of complainant for quashing of proceedings
Compromise between parties being recognised ground for quashing of proceedings, application as such was accepted. Ch. Muhammad Abdus Salam for Petitioners. Shamim Hussain Bokhari for the Complainant. Muhammad Iqbal for the State. This is an application for quashment of complaint under section 392/34 filed by Ijaz Hassan, respondent, No.2, pending in the Court of Ilaqa Magistrate, Gojra.
2. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that by now the parties have compromised and the complainant, respondent No.2, does not desire to pursue the complaint filed by him. He does not intend to produce any evidence in the trial Court. In view of the compromise between the parties, learned counsel for the State has not opposed this petition. Since compromise between the parties is a recognized ground for the quashment of proceedings, therefore, this application is accepted and proceedings against the petitioners in complaint pending before Ilaqa Magistrate, Gojra, are quashed. Disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./R-316/L Application accepted.