2010 PLP 941 (MLD)
ZULFIQAR HAIDER — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and 7 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 941 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ZULFIQAR HAIDER — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and 7 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance (XXI of 2007) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 941 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Rented Premises Ordinance (XXI of 2007) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 941 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 941 (MLD) (ZULFIQAR HAIDER — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and 7 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----S. 28---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Impleading as party in the appeal---Petitioner, pending the matter had filed an application for his impleading as party which application had been dismissed by the Special Judge (Rent)---Validity---Counsel for respondent had stated that he had no objection if constitutional petition was disposed of with the direction to the Appellate Court to decide the matter afresh and give decision on connected appeal---Impugned order was set aside and case was remanded to Appellate Court for decision afresh within stipulated period.
- Muhammad Zafar Chaudhry for Petitioner.
- Nadeem-ud-Malik for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 28
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Impleading as party in the appeal
Petitioner, pending the matter had filed an application for his impleading as party which application had been dismissed by the Special Judge (Rent)
Counsel for respondent had stated that he had no objection if constitutional petition was disposed of with the direction to the Appellate Court to decide the matter afresh and give decision on connected appeal
Impugned order was set aside and case was remanded to Appellate Court for decision afresh within stipulated period.
Judgment & Decree
S. ALI HASSAN RIZVI, J.
This writ petition arises out of impugned order, dated 17-2-2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in two rent appeals pending before him. The petitioner in a rent matter already pending had filed an application under Order, I Rule 10, C.P.C. for his impleadment as party which was dismissed by the learned Special Judge (Rent) on 20-12-2008 but at the time disposal of appeal along with the connected appeal titled "Muhammad Mazhar and others v. Zulifqar Haider" learned appellate Court failed to pass any order on the appeal filed by the petitioner titled "Mst. Bilqees etc. v. Zulifqar Haider".
2. Learned counsel for the respondents subscribed his view with the version of learned counsel that the learned Additional District Judge as appellate Court while passing the order, dated 17-2-2009 did not pass any order in the connected appeal and he has no objection if this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the learned appellate Court to decide afresh to the matter and gave his decision on the connected appeal pending with him titled "Bilqees v. Zulifqar Haider".
3. Resultantly, the impugned order, dated 17-2-2009 is set aside. The case is remanded to the Additional District Judge for decision afresh on the appeal titled "Mst. Bilqees and others v. Zulifqar Haider" within two months from the date of receipt of order. The writ petition stands accepted. H.B.T./Z-40/L Case remanded.