1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
JAVAID AKHTAR Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD, FAISALABAD DIVISION,
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | JAVAID AKHTAR Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD, FAISALABAD DIVISION, |
| Primary Law | (b) Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, (a) Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, (a) Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (JAVAID AKHTAR Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD, FAISALABAD DIVISION,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- MA. Riaz for Appellant.
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 11th February, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
Mere acquittal of civil servant in criminal case by Court, would not mean that no action could be taken against him departmentally as acquittal on a criminal case had no bearing on disciplinary proceedings. Amir Abdullah v. Supdt of Police and others 1989 SCMR 333 ref.
R. 4
Both promotion and increment of civil servant, could not be withheld nor more than one annual increment could be stopped and that too with cumulative effect.
Judgment & Decree
(a) Civil service
Mere acquittal of civil servant in criminal case by Court, would not mean that no action could be taken against him departmentally as acquittal on a criminal case had no bearing on disciplinary proceedings. Amir Abdullah v. Supdt of Police and others 1989 SCMR 333 ref. (b) Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975
R. 4
Both promotion and increment of civil servant, could not be withheld nor more than one annual increment could be stopped and that too with cumulative effect. MA. Riaz for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 11th February, 1991.