SCMR 1993

1993 PLP 1302 (SCMR)

Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No. 8 of 1993, decided on 26th May, 1993,
Honorable Judges
Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Shafiur Rahman, Saad Saood Jan; Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry Ajmal Mian, Muhammad Afzal Lone, Sajjad Ali Shah, Muhammad Rafique Tarar, Saleem Akhtar, Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui and Fazal Elahi Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1993 PLP 1302 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Shafiur Rahman, Saad Saood Jan; Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry Ajmal Mian, Muhammad Afzal Lone, Sajjad Ali Shah, Muhammad Rafique Tarar, Saleem Akhtar, Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui and Fazal Elahi Khan, JJ
Parties Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 1302 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 1302 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, CJ., Shafiur Rahman, Saad Saood Jan; Abdul Qadeer Chaudhry Ajmal Mian, Muhammad Afzal Lone, Sajjad Ali Shah, Muhammad Rafique Tarar, Saleem Akhtar, Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui and Fazal Elahi Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 1302 (SCMR) (Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Yahya Bakhtiar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Khalid Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court, Khalid M. Ishaque, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Zakiuddin Pal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Aftab Farrukh, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Ch. Muhammad Farooq, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Raja Muhammad Akram, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, M. Akram Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court, Ashtar Ausaf Ali, Advocate Supreme Court, Mian Saqib Nisar, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Aziz A. Munshi, Attorney‑General for Pakistan, Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General, Punjab, Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, Deputy Attorney‑General, Ch. Ijaz Ahmad, Deputy Attorney‑General, M. Zahoorul Haq, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Makhdoom Ali Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Fazle Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
  • Dates of hearing: 26th, April; 8th to 12th May and 15th May to 26th May, 1993.
  • Raja Muhammad Afsar, Advocate‑General, Balochistan, A.G. Mangi, Additional Advocate‑General, Sindh, M. Sardar Khan, Advocate‑General, N.‑W.F.P. and Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General, Punjab on Court Notice.

Headnotes / Summary

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Arts. 184(3) & 58(2)(b)‑‑‑Constitutional petition against Order by the President of Pakistan dated 18th April, 1993 dissolving National Assembly and dismissing the Prime Minister and the Cabinet under Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution and other enabling powers available to him in that behalf, was maintainable before the Supreme Court under Art.184(3). (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑Arts. 58(2)(b) & 184(3)‑‑‑Dissolution of National Assembly and dismissal of Prime Minister and the Cabinet under Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan by the President of Pakistan vide Order dated 18th April, 1993 being not within the ambit of the powers conferred on the President of Pakistan under Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan and other enabling powers available to him, in that behalf, was without lawful authority and of no legal effect‑‑‑National Assembly, Prime Minister and the Cabinet consequently were to stand restored and entitled to function as immediately before the Presidential Order of 18th April, 1993 was passed; all steps taken pursuance to the Presidential Order dated 18th April, 1993 passed under Art. 58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan such as appointment of Caretaker Cabinet etc. were to be of no legal effect‑‑‑Supreme Court, however, observed that all orders passed, acts done and measures taken in the meanwhile by the Caretaker Government which had been done, taken and given effect to in accordance with the terms of the Constitution and were required to be done or taken for the ordinary orderly running of the State would all be deemed to have been validly and legally done. Raja Muhammad Afsar, Advocate‑General, Balochistan, A.G. Mangi, Additional Advocate‑General, Sindh, M. Sardar Khan, Advocate‑General, N.‑W.F.P. and Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General, Punjab on Court Notice.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑‑Arts. 58(2)(b) & 184(3)‑‑‑Dissolution of National Assembly and dismissal of Prime Minister and the Cabinet under Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan by the President of Pakistan vide Order dated 18th April, 1993 being not within the ambit of the powers conferred on the President of Pakistan under Art.58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan and other enabling powers available to him, in that behalf, was without lawful authority and of no legal effect‑‑‑National Assembly, Prime Minister and the Cabinet consequently were to stand restored and entitled to function as immediately before the Presidential Order of 18th April, 1993 was passed; all steps taken pursuance to the Presidential Order dated 18th April, 1993 passed under Art. 58(2)(b) of the Constitution of Pakistan such as appointment of Caretaker Cabinet etc. were to be of no legal effect‑‑‑Supreme Court, however, observed that all orders passed, acts done and measures taken in the meanwhile by the Caretaker Government which had been done, taken and given effect to in accordance with the terms of the Constitution and were required to be done or taken for the ordinary orderly running of the State would all be deemed to have been validly and legally done. Yahya Bakhtiar, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Khalid Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court, Khalid M. Ishaque, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Zakiuddin Pal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Aftab Farrukh, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Ch. Muhammad Farooq, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Raja Muhammad Akram, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, M. Akram Sheikh, Advocate Supreme Court, Ashtar Ausaf Ali, Advocate Supreme Court, Mian Saqib Nisar, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Aziz A. Munshi, Attorney‑General for Pakistan, Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General, Punjab, Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, Deputy Attorney‑General, Ch. Ijaz Ahmad, Deputy Attorney‑General, M. Zahoorul Haq, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Makhdoom Ali Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Fazle Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents. Raja Muhammad Afsar, Advocate‑General, Balochistan, A.G. Mangi, Additional Advocate‑General, Sindh, M. Sardar Khan, Advocate‑General, N.‑W.F.P. and Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate‑General, Punjab on Court Notice. Dates of hearing: 26th, April; 8th to 12th May and 15th May to 26th May, 1993. We hold by majority of (10 to 1) that the petition is maintainable under Article 184(3) of the Constitution. On merits, by majority (of 10 to 1) we hold that the order of the 18th April, 1993, passed by the President of Pakistan is not within the ambit of the powers conferred on the President under Article 58(2)(b) of the Constitution and other enabling powers available to him in that behalf and has, therefore, been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. As a consequence of our order, the National Assembly, Prime Minister and the Cabinet shall stand restored and entitled to function as immediately before the impugned order was paced. All steps taken pursuant to the order dated 18th April, 1993 passed under Article 58(2)(b) of the Constitution such as the appointment of Caretaker Cabinet etc. will, therefore, be of no legal effect. However, all orders passed, acts done and measures taken in the meanwhile by the Caretaker Government, which have been done, taken and given effect to in accordance with the terms of the Constitution and were required to be done or taken for the ordinary orderly running of the State shall all be deemed to have been validly and legally done. M.BA./M‑1762/S??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Petition accepted.