2000 PLP 418 (YLR)
ABDUL MAJEED — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2000 PLP 418 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ahmad Nawaz Malik, J |
| Parties | ABDUL MAJEED — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 418 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 418 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ahmad Nawaz Malik, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 418 (YLR) (ABDUL MAJEED — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Appellant
Headnotes / Summary
Ss.331 & 311
Accused had served the substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to him by Trial Court under S.311, P.P.C, but he was in Jail due to non- payment of Diyat amount to the parents of the deceased who had not forgiven him
Accused was unable to pay the Diyat as he was in Jail
Accused was released on bail under 5.331, P. P. C. in circumstances subject to his furnishing security equivalent to the amount of Diyat to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Sh. Muhammad Rahim for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Ss.331 & 311
Accused had served the substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to him by Trial Court under S.311, P.P.C, but he was in Jail due to non- payment of Diyat amount to the parents of the deceased who had not forgiven him
Accused was unable to pay the Diyat as he was in Jail
Accused was released on bail under 5.331, P. P. C. in circumstances subject to his furnishing security equivalent to the amount of Diyat to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Appellant Sh. Muhammad Rahim for the State. In case F.I.R. No.101 of 1994 registered on 20-8-1994 under section 302, P.P.C. at Police Station, Fateh Shah, District Vehari the petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Vehari vide the judgment dated 18-11-1996 as follows: -- "Under section 311, P.P.C. imprisonment for five years' R.I. to pay Diyat amount with benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C." The appellant seeks bail under section 331, P.P.C. as he has already undergone the sentence of imprisonment. The report was called for from the Superintendent, New Central Jail, Multan. Vide letter No.3957/ASW dated 13-5-1998, he has reported that the appellant has served his substantive sentence on 1-12-1997 but he is in the jail in the default of payment of Diyat of Rs. 56,970 to be paid to the mother and father of the deceased who had not forgiven. The appellant has not been able to pay the Diyat as he is in the jail. In view of the provisions of section 331, P.P.C., it is requested that he be released subject to his _ furnishing security equivalent to the amount of Diyat to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The learned counsel for the State has no objection. He is allowed to be released subject to his furnishing security equivalent to the amount of Diyat to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Disposed of. N.H.Q./A-107/L