YLR 2011

2011 PLP 1348 (YLR)

GHULAM ABBAS — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Jail Appeal No.S-60 of 2005, decided on 31st December, 2009.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Sarwar Korai, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 PLP 1348 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Ghulam Sarwar Korai, J
Parties GHULAM ABBAS — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP 1348 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP 1348 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ghulam Sarwar Korai, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP 1348 (YLR) (GHULAM ABBAS — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Representation

  • Nisar Ahmed G. Abro for Appellant.
  • Date of hearing: 17th December, 2009.
  • "17-12-2009. Appellant is produced in custody. Mr.Nisar Ahmed G.Abro. advocate for the appellant.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 302 (b)

Qatl-e-amd

Appreciation of evidence

Co-accused named in the F.I.R. with role were tried and acquitted, while case against accused was kept on dormant file as during the proceedings he had absconded

Accused. was again arrested and case was proceeded and he was convicted

According letter submitted by Superintendent Jail, accused had served out sentence of twelve years, one month and two days, while accused had earned eight years, seven months and 6 days as remission

Period for which accused was in jail, was sufficient for his conviction

Appeal filed by accused, was dismissed, but his sentence was reduced to which he had already undergone

Conviction of accused for offence punishable under S.302(b), P.P.C. was converted to S.302(c), P.P.C. and accordingly sentenced for imprisonment for which he had already undergone. Naimatullah Bhurgri for the State.

Judgment & Decree

GHULAM SARWAR KORAI, J.

On 19-8-1993 at about 630 hours F.I.R. No. 159 of 93 was registered at P.S. A Section Larkana of the incident which allegedly took place on the same date at about 4-30 hours by one Syed Deeder Hussain Shah for the murder of Nazar Hussain Shah against Nazir, Suhno and Lal Bux. This incident was allegedly witnessed by Shabir Shah, Fida Hussain Shah and Nazeer Hussain Shah. After registration of F.I.R. of three nominated accused with the role were let-off by the police and subsequently appellant was arrested, his confessional statement was allegedly recorded, case was tried and appellant was convicted and sentenced for offence punishable under section 302(b), Cr.P.C. for life imprisonment and compensation of Rs.50,000 to be paid to the legal heirs of the deceased Nazar Hussain Shah in case of default thereof, same was ordered to be recovered as arrears of land revenue and if it is not possible the appellant was ordered to suffer R.I. for six months more. The appellant was also found guilty for offence punishable under section 404, P.P.C., therefore, he was convicted and sentenced R.I. for three years and fine of Rs.5,000 in case of default of payment of fine R.I. for six months. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. He was also extended benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C. During proceedings the co. accused named in the F.I.R. with role were tried and acquitted vide judgment dated 21-4-2001. While the case against the 21 Present appellant was kept on dormant file as during proceedings he absconded. While he again arrested and the case was proceeded, the evidence of the witnesses were recorded and the present appellant was convicted as stated above. On the request of the appellant jail roll was called, same was sent by Superintendent. Central Prison Larkana vide his letter No.12345 dated 9-10-2009 and according to him the appellant served out sentence 12 years one month and 2 days while 8 years 7 months and 6 days have earned as remission up to 6-10-2009. From the facts and circumstances of the case if the same may be believed in toto then the period for which appellant was in jail is sufficient for his conviction, therefore, I dismiss this criminal jail appeal but reduce the sentence which he has already undergone, so also set aside the fine of Rs.50,000 and 5000 in my short order dated 17-12-2009 and these are the reasons of the above, which are reproduced as under:-- "17-12-2009. Appellant is produced in custody. Mr.Nisar Ahmed G.Abro. advocate for the appellant. Mr. Naimatullah Bhurgri, State counsel. For the reasons to by recorded later on, I convert the conviction and sentence of the appellant for offence punishable under section 302(b), P.P.C. to 302(c), P.P.C. and convict him for imprisonment for which he has already undergone as according to jail roll sent by Superintendent, Central Prison, Larkana vide his letter No.12345, dated 6-10-2009 appellant has served out 12 years 1 month and 2 days while 8 years 7 months and 6 days have earned as remission up to 6-10-2009. I set aside fine of Rs.50,000 awarded to him in addition to life imprisonment so also I set aside fine of Rs.5000 awarded to him in addition to punishment under sections 504, 452, P.P.C." H.B.T./G-15/K Order accordingly.