1970 PLP 651 (SCMR)
AMANULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus KHAN ATTAULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
| Citation | 1970 PLP 651 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | AMANULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus KHAN ATTAULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents |
| Primary Law | N.W. F. P. Pre-emption Act (XIV of 1950), |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1970 PLP 651 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: N.W. F. P. Pre-emption Act (XIV of 1950), as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1970 PLP 651 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1970 PLP 651 (SCMR) (AMANULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus KHAN ATTAULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Younis Mian, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Nur Ahmad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 28th March 1970.
- Muhammad Younis Mian, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Nur Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Bench, dated the 14th November 1969, in Civil Revision No. 152 of 1968).
S. 23(1) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58(3)-Pre-emption suit Assessment of probable value of law involved in pending pre-emption suit-No function of Supreme Court at leave stage-No question of law involved-Petition for Leave to Appeal dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C. J.‑This is a petition for special leave to appeal from an order, passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Seat, in the revisional jurisdiction. It appears that on the basis of a decree dated the 27th September 1967, the petitioners and some others got 1167 kanals and 10 marlas of land, situated in village Masha Mansoor from one Hamidullah for Rs. 1,50,
000. The respon dent Ataullah Khan sought to pre‑empt the transaction, alleging that it was really a sale by Hamidullah in favour of the petitioners. In this pre‑emption suit a Civil Judge asked the pre‑emptor to deposit Rs. 5,000 as the probable value of the land sought to be pre‑empted under section 23, subsection (1) of the N.‑W. F. P. Pre‑emption Act, 1950. The petitioners went up in revision to the High Court against the said order, alleging that the amount had been fixed arbitrarily. According to them the probable value was the value mentioned in the decree, namely, Rs. 1,50,
000. The High Court, however, took the view that since the lands were mostly Barani, Rs. 20 per kanal would be a fair assessment of the probable value of the land, and ordered the pre‑emptor to deposit pre‑emption money at the said rate within the period fixed by the Civil Judge. The petitioners now seek special leave to appeal. N serious question of law is involved in this case and it is no' the function of this Court to make assessments of the probable value of the land at this stage. If the petitioners think that the amount of the consideration has been arbitrarily fixed, they should raise this point as an issue in the pre‑emption suit itself, and have it decided in the trial Court. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Leave refused.