1989 PLP 598 (SCMR)
RAB NAWAZ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Lt.‑Col. Raja SHAUKAT MAHMOOD and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 598 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid lqbal, JJ |
| Parties | RAB NAWAZ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Lt.‑Col. Raja SHAUKAT MAHMOOD and another‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 598 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 598 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Javid lqbal, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 598 (SCMR) (RAB NAWAZ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus Lt.‑Col. Raja SHAUKAT MAHMOOD and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Sh. Abdur Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 14th November, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
November, 1988. (On appeal against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed m I.CA. No.93 of 1983, dated 1‑10‑1983). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal was refused where High Court's judgment did not suffer from any legal error.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal was refused where High Court's judgment did not suffer from any legal error. Sh. Abdur Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners. Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents. Date of hearing: 14th November, 1988. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑The petitioners' Intra‑Court Appeal arising out of a land settlement case, having been dismissed by the High Court, leave to appeal has now been sought. The impugned order reads as follows:‑‑ "The appellants are purchasers from one Hari Singh, whose total entitlement comes to 1316 units including all kinds of Beshis. Land equivalent to 1323 P.I. Units has already been allotted to them in Dehh Punnun , for which village his claim was verified. This being so, Hari Singh could not be allotted any land in Sahjra. The appeal is, therefore, without any merit and is hereby dismissed in limine." After hearing the learned counsel who tried to show that the assumption made by the High Court regarding satisfaction of the petitioners P.I. Units, was not correct, we are not satisfied on the point that the High Court's judgment suffers from any legal error. Leave to appeal, therefore, is refused. AA./R‑76/S Leave to appeal refused.