2002 PLP 3070(1) (YLR)
STATE through Advocate‑General, Sindh, Karachi‑‑‑Appellant Versus Syed AYUB HAIDER NAQVI alias CHANDA‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 3070(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | S.A. Sarwana and Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui, JJ |
| Parties | STATE through Advocate‑General, Sindh, Karachi‑‑‑Appellant Versus Syed AYUB HAIDER NAQVI alias CHANDA‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Panel Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 3070(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Panel Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 3070(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: S.A. Sarwana and Muhammad Mujeebullah Siddiqui, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 3070(1) (YLR) (STATE through Advocate‑General, Sindh, Karachi‑‑‑Appellant Versus Syed AYUB HAIDER NAQVI alias CHANDA‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- STATE through Advocate‑General, Sindh, Karachi‑‑‑Appellant
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Ss.302/34/109‑‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(1)‑‑‑Appeal against acquittal‑‑‑No illegality or infirmity could be pointed out in the impugned Judgment of acquittal passed by Trial Court‑‑ Evidence and material available on record had rightly been appreciated by the Trial Court which required no interference by High Court‑‑‑Appeal against acquittal of accused was dismissed in limine accordingly. Habib Ahmed, A.A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Special Anti‑Terrorism Acquittal Appeal No.114 of 2000, decided on 11th June, 2002. ‑‑‑‑Ss.302/34/109‑‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(1)‑‑‑Appeal against acquittal‑‑‑No illegality or infirmity could be pointed out in the impugned Judgment of acquittal passed by Trial Court‑‑ Evidence and material available on record had rightly been appreciated by the Trial Court which required no interference by High Court‑‑‑Appeal against acquittal of accused was dismissed in limine accordingly. Habib Ahmed, A.A.-G. for the State. This is an Appeal under section 25(4) of Anti‑Terrorism Act read with section 417, Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 4‑9‑2000 passed by the learned Anti‑Terrorism Court No.3, Karachi, in Special Case No.9 of 1999 whereby the respondent has been acquitted of the charge under sections 302/34/109. P.P.C. The learned A.A.‑G has taken us through the impugned judgment. He has not been able to point out any illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment. After going through the Impugned Judgment we are of the opinion that the learned trial Court has rightly appreciated the evidence and material available on record and consequently no interference is required with the judgment of acquittal recorded by the learned trial Court. The appeal stands dismissed in limine. N.H.Q./S‑218/K Appeal dismissed.