PCRLJ 2007

2007 P Cr (PLP)

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ NIRBAN — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2007-March-22
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2007 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ NIRBAN — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ NIRBAN — Petitioner Versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • S.M. Iqbal and Saadat Hussain for Petitioner.
  • In these circumstances, the learned Advocate for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is being harassed as he has already been sent for trial for commission of said offence; that at the most the case could have been transferred to the Accountability Court.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Ss.9/10

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.l99

Constitutional petition

Pre-arrest bail, grant of

Accused apprehended his arrest during the process of inquiry initiated by NAB Authorities, who being an Accountant in a company had allegedly misappropriated its amount through cheques

Allegation against accused had already been investigated by the regular police and challan had been submitted in the Court of Magistrate

During inquiry officials of some banks were also found involved and in such a situation the offence could be only tried by the Court created under the Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984

Inquiry report had been submitted, but the Chairman NAB had not passed any order referring the Cease for investigation and it was not known when such order would be passed or the investigation would be completed

Interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused was confirmed in circumstances directing him to cooperate in the investigation.

Judgment & Decree

RAHMAT HUSSAIN JAFFERI, J.

This is a petition for grant of pre-arrest bail. The petitioner apprehends his arrest during the process of inquiry initiated by NAB Authorities on the allegations that the petitioner, who was accountant in Messrs Saratex (Pvt.) Limited, had misappropriated the amount of the company by drawing various amounts through cheques from the account of the company. The petitioner's case is that the company had lodged the F.I.R. No.60 of 2002 for offence punishable under sections 408 and 381, P.P.C. on 4-4-2002 on the same allegation. After the investigation, the case was challaned, which is pending before the Court of Vth Judicial Magistrate, Karachi-South. The petitioner has been granted bail in the said case. The company had also filed Civil Suit bearing No.180 of 2005 for recovery of the amount drawn by the petitioner from the bank through alleged various cheques. The said suit is also pending. The case of prosecution is that an application was moved before the F.I.A. Authorities for investigating the case as some banks' employees were also involved in the offence. After Notification dated 16-8-2004, the F.I.A. Authorities were debarred from investigating the case of misappropriation of amount therefore the said application was transferred to NAB Authorities. The NAB Authorities started inquiry. The Inquiry Officer has completed the inquiry and submitted the report to the Chairman, NAB with recommendation that investigation may be ordered in the matter. The learned DPGA has stated that so far the Chairman, NAB or an officer duly authorized by him has not passed any order with regard to the authorization of the investigation. In these circumstances, the learned Advocate for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is being harassed as he has already been sent for trial for commission of said offence; that at the most the case could have been transferred to the Accountability Court. The learned DPGA has stated that the case was investigated by regular police who submitted challan before the Court of Judicial Magistrate but as the offence would fall under Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance, 1984 therefore the gravity of offence has been increased. As such, the NAB Authorities has jurisdiction to investigate the case. He has further stated that if at some later stage the Chairman NAB finds it expedient in the interest of justice that the case be transferred, then he can make request to learned Vth Judicial Magistrate, Karachi-South for transfer of the said case under section 16-A of the Ordinance. He has further stated that there is no mala fide on the part of the NAB Authorities or the petitioner has proved such allegation therefore the petitioner is not entitled to the concession of pre-arrest bail. In the circumstances, it appears that the allegation was already investigated by the regular police and the case hat been challaned in the Court of Vth Judicial Magistrate, Karachi-South. It appears that during the inquiry it has been found that some banks' officials are also involved therefore in such a situation the offence can be, only tried by Court created under the Ordinance of 1984. The inquiry report has been submitted. So far the Chairman, NAB has not passed any order referring the case for investigation. It is not known when such order will be passed or the investigation will be completed. In these circumstances we find that the petitioner is entitled to the grant of bail. Thus, interim bail already granted to the petitioner is confirmed on same terms and conditions with direction to the petitioner to cooperate with the Investigating Officer or the NAB Authorities in the investigation. At the same time we are leaving it at the liberty of the NAB Authorities to move the Court for cancellation of bail, if some tangible material is brought on the record during the Courts of investigation. The petition is allowed in the above terms. The copy of the inquiry report was submitted before the Court for perusal. After perusing the same, the same has been returned to DPG, NAB. N.H.Q./M-56/K Pre-arrest bail allowed.