1984 PLP 1537(1) (MLD)
FALAK SHER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1537(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Kamal Mustafa Bokhari, J |
| Parties | FALAK SHER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1537(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1537(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Kamal Mustafa Bokhari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1537(1) (MLD) (FALAK SHER — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Muhammad Zawwar Shah for petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34--Bail--Accused not causing any injury to deceased and allegedly accompanying his co-accused with a hatchet in his hand--Case against accused of further inquiry Bail granted. Nasim Rashid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1327-B of 1983, decided on 5th November, 1983.
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34--Bail--Accused not causing any injury to deceased and allegedly accompanying his co-accused with a hatchet in his hand--Case against accused of further inquiry Bail granted. Syed Muhammad Zawwar Shah for petitioner. Nasim Rashid for the State. Falak Sher and his three co-accused allegedly attacked and caused murder of Ahmad Masih and simple injuries to latters son Sabah Masih. Petitioner is attributed simple injury to Sabah Masih son of the deceased, He allegedly accompanied his co-accused with a hatchet in his hand but did not cause any hatchet injury to the deceased. The assailants had gone to the land for committing the theft of water turn, which was of the deceased. It will be for the trial Court to determine if petitioner shared the common intention to cause murder or murderous assault. The case against the petitioner who did not cause any injury to the deceased, is of further inquiry. In the circumstances petitioner is allowed bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs.25,000 (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate Khanewal. M. Y. H. Bail granted.