1987 P Cr (PLP)
TARIQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mazharul Haq, J |
| Parties | TARIQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mazharul Haq, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (TARIQ‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979) , S.17‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No direct evidence available on record‑‑Only evidence being of extra‑judicial confession and identification of accused before Police‑‑No identification parade held, for identification of accused‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances. Abdur Rehman Madni for the State
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.365'3/B of 1986, decided on 8th February, 1987. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979) , S.17‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No direct evidence available on record‑‑Only evidence being of extra‑judicial confession and identification of accused before Police‑‑No identification parade held, for identification of accused‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances. Abdur Rehman Madni for the State There is extra‑judicial confession of the petitioner and identification of the petitioner before the police. There is no regular identification parade held for his identification. Learned counsel for the petitioner 'contended that in the absence of the direct evidence, the petitioner may ultimately be guilty of the offence under section 411 P.P.C. because the scooter was allegedly recovered from him.
2. I have considered the matter. Admittedly, there is no identification parade held in this case. Petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sargodha. S.A./T‑4/L Bail allowed.