2010 PLP 225 (PLC)
SAFDAR JABBAR Versus GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. through Manager
| Citation | 2010 PLP 225 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal |
| Bench Members | Justice (Rtd.) Ali Muhammad Baloch, Chairman |
| Parties | SAFDAR JABBAR Versus GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. through Manager |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 225 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 225 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal bench comprising: Justice (Rtd.) Ali Muhammad Baloch, Chairman.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 225 (PLC) (SAFDAR JABBAR Versus GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. through Manager). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 41 & 55(8)
Application for transfer of grievance petition to another court
Applicant's side was over before the Labour Court and the respondent had also started his evidence and the matter was likely to be finally decided, if no further time was wasted
No cogent reason was shown for transferring the case to any other court as on transfer, the parties had to be served with fresh notices and the court could call R & Ps from the original court where it was nearing completion
If any party was aggrieved with the judgment of the original court, he had the right to come in appeal before the Tribunal. Muhammad Shafiq Qureshi for Applicant.
Judgment & Decree
JUSTICE (RTD.) ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH (CHAIRMAN).
The contents of application for transfer have been perused and the comments from Sindh Labour Court No.IV, Karachi, have been read. The learned Counsel for the applicant has been heard. It is clear that side of evidence of the applicant is over before Labour Court, and the respondent has also started his evidence and the matter is likely to be finally decided, if no further time is wasted,. I do not find any cogent reason for transferring this case to any other Court as on transfer the parties have to be served with fresh notices and the Court may call R&Ps from the original Court where it is nearing completion., If any party is aggrieved with the judgment of the original Court, he has the right to come in appeal before the Tribunal. In order to save the time of the parties and the Court the application for transfer is dismissed. The original Court is directed to decide the case, without any delay. H.B.T./4-SLT Application dismissed.