1987 PLP 1721 (SCMR)
MUKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus MOHSIN ALI SHAH and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1721 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MUKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus MOHSIN ALI SHAH and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1721 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1721 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1721 (SCMR) (MUKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus MOHSIN ALI SHAH and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Jari Ullah Khan, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Iqbal Ahmad Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- M.B. Zaman, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Ijaz Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l.
- Date of hearing: 17th June, 1987.
- Altaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 8th February, 1987 in Criminal Miscellaneous No.3579‑B of 1986). ‑‑‑S. 497(5)‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Bail, cancellation of‑‑Discretionary order of High Court‑‑Interference with‑‑Respondent placed by investigating officer in column No.2 of challan and not summoned as an accused by trial judge was allowed bail‑‑High Court refused to cancel his bail and Supreme Court declined to interfere with discretionary order of High Court‑‑Leave to appeal refused. Altaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑ The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against an order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 8th February, 1987 dismissing his application for cancellation of bail of Mohsin Ali Shah respondent. Notice was issued to the State on the last date of hearing. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as for the State, and Mohsin Ali Shah respondent. We are informed that Mohsin Ali Shah has been placed by the investigating officer in column No.2 of the challan and he has not yet been summoned as an accused by the learned trial Judge. In this view of the matter we do not consider it to be a fit case for interference with the discretionary order of the Lahore High Court. The petition is therefore dismissed. M.I./M‑144/S Petition dismissed.