1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
FAZAL HUSSAIN Versus D.I: G. POLICE, GUJRANWALA and another
| Citation | 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Service Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member |
| Parties | FAZAL HUSSAIN Versus D.I: G. POLICE, GUJRANWALA and another |
| Primary Law | Civil service |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Abdul Hamid Khan, Member.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (FAZAL HUSSAIN Versus D.I: G. POLICE, GUJRANWALA and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M.A. Riaz for Appellant.
- Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
Relevant record produced before Tribunal had unrebuttedly proved that departmental representation of civil servant with regard to his promotion and confirmation as Sub-Inspector, was rejected by Authorities without passing self-speaking orders, which otherwise were not maintainable under law
Tribunal set aside orders of Authorities and directed them to decide case afresh in accordance with law on merits.
Judgment & Decree
D.I: G. POLICE, GUJRANWALA and another Appeal No.113/726 of 1988, decided on 27th January, 1990. Civil service
Relevant record produced before Tribunal had unrebuttedly proved that departmental representation of civil servant with regard to his promotion and confirmation as Sub-Inspector, was rejected by Authorities without passing self-speaking orders, which otherwise were not maintainable under law
Tribunal set aside orders of Authorities and directed them to decide case afresh in accordance with law on merits. M.A. Riaz for Appellant. Ch. Manzoor Hussain, D.A. for Respondents.