1986 P Cr (PLP)
SARWAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Mazharul Haq, J |
| Parties | SARWAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Mazharul Haq, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (SARWAR and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Farooq Hussain Naqvi for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 13th April, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 453‑Pefl Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 307 & 323/148/149‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Two of petitioners causing simple injuries to prosecution witnesses with sharp‑edged weapons‑‑Third petitioner allegedly fired in air‑‑None of petitioners caused any injury to deceased‑‑Petitioners allowed bail in circumstances. Malik Rehmat Khan Awan for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 453‑Pefl Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 307 & 323/148/149‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Two of petitioners causing simple injuries to prosecution witnesses with sharp‑edged weapons‑‑Third petitioner allegedly fired in air‑‑None of petitioners caused any injury to deceased‑‑Petitioners allowed bail in circumstances. Farooq Hussain Naqvi for Petitioners. Malik Rehmat Khan Awan for the State. Date of hearing: 13th April, 1986. Sarwar, Ilyas and Afzal petitioners alongwith five others are accused of the murder of Abdul Wahid and for having murderously assaulted three witnesses of the crime. The case was registered against at Police Station, Jaranwala on 29‑8‑1985.
2. The background of the crime in this case is political rivalry. Sarwar petitioner was armed with a Datar, Ilyas with a dagger and Afzal with a carbine. The role attributed to the first two was an injury to the prosecution witnesses. They have not touched the deceased. Similarly Afzal allegedly fired in the air. The fire‑arm injuries suffered by the deceased are attributed to Anwar and Shaukat. The injuries suffered by the witnesses at the hands of the aforementioned two petitioners are simple in nature. They are, therefore, allowed bail. Since Afzal did not fire at any one, he is also allowed bail. The petitioners shall furnish sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000 (Twenty‑five thousand) each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the A.C./Duty Magistrate, Jaranwala. H.A.K. Bail allowed.