MLD 1987

1987 PLP 1515 (MLD)

DILMURAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No. 437 of 1984, decided on 23rd May, 1984.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1987 PLP 1515 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J
Parties DILMURAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1515 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1515 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1515 (MLD) (DILMURAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Azizullah K. Sheikh for Appellant.
  • Date of hearing: 23rd May, 1984.

Headnotes / Summary

S.498--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302--Bail before arrest--Applicant named in F.I. R. and use of fire-arm ass9ned to him--Bail refused in circumstances. A. Sattar Sheikh, Addl. A.-G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Azizullah K. Sheikh for Appellant. A. Sattar Sheikh, Addl. A.-G. for the State. Date of hearing: 23rd May, 1984. This application is made by one Dil Murad for grant of bail before arrest in a case of murder. I have heard Mr. Azizullah K.Sheikh and Mr. Abdul Sattar Sheikh Additional Advocates General. A report was lodged on 24-4-1984 at five minutes past mid-night at Bagarji Police Station of Shikarpura District. The allegation is of r murder of one Allah Ditto. The case has not yet proceeded, and even the accused has not been arrested. The F. I. R. discloses that there was matrimonial dispute between the complainant party on one hand and Bahadur on the other hand. On account of this dispute over matrimonial affairs there was a case also and the married woman had gone away to her parents. In regard to the incident the complainant stated that his father viz. the deceased was sleeping in front of the house to keep watch on cattle where an electric light was also on. Reports of firing were heard which attracted complainant Muhammad Ayub and his brothers Abdul Majid and Allah Rakhio. The' complainant and the witnesses saw the applicant with, a pistol, Bahadur with a gun, Raza Muhammad and Fakir Muhammad with hatchet. It is stated in the report that in their presence applicant Dil Murad used the fire-arm. It is also stated that the remaining accused used the other weapons. The deceased was found to be having hatchet and fire-arm injuries. The learned Advocate has mainly contended that the applicant had no motive and the medical evidence does not corroborate the

incident given in the first information Report Mr. Abdul Sattar Sheikh has placed before me the medical certificate which shows that the deceased had four injuries. Two out these incised wounds and the remaining two were circular lacerated wounds. These two C.L. wounds are caused by fire-arm. Significantly one of the C.L. wounds has a diameter of 21 c.m. while the other had a diameter of 1 c.m. One bullet had been extracted from the smaller C.L. wound. Prima facie these circumstances indicate use of two different fire-arms. One out of these may be a pistol. It is also common knowledge that very often .12 bore cartridges are also fired from pistol. Be that as it may I would not like to enter deeper into this aspect of the case but the injuries may well-establish that two different fire-arms have been used. Coming to the point of motive all that needs to be said is that this is a very premature stage and I would not like to enter into that question. Since the applicant is named in F.I.R. and a part has been assigned to him I am not inclined to grant bail in this case. It shall however, be open to the trial Court to consider the question of bail after some evidence is recorded and if an application is moved. M.A. K. /D-9/K?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Petition dismissed.