2010 GBLR 419 (PLP)
Suo Motu Case No.5 of 2009
| Citation | 2010 GBLR 419 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J. and Muhammad Yaqoob, J |
| Parties | Suo Motu Case No.5 of 2009 |
| Primary Law | Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 GBLR 419 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 GBLR 419 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, C.J. and Muhammad Yaqoob, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 GBLR 419 (PLP) (Suo Motu Case No.5 of 2009). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- ----Art. 61---Suo motu jurisdiction of Supreme Appellate Court---Construction of Naltar road---Advocate General had submitted that reconstruction of the damaged road would only be possible in the next season; as the matter was still under consideration with the concerned authorities; and even if decision was taken at an early date, the work could not be carried out in winter season---Advocate General had further submitted that since remaining portion of the road was already complete in all respects, further proceedings in the case could be closed for the time being---Further proceedings for the time being, were closed by the Supreme Appellate Court and matter was disposed of accordingly.
- Advocate General Gilgit-Baltistan.
- Learned Advocate General assisted by XEN B&R Division Gilgit submitted that in view of the order dated 13-10-2010 the re-construction of the damaged road would only be possible in the next season, as the matter is still under consideration with concerned, authorities and even if decision is taken at an early date, the work cannot be carried out in winter season. The learned Advocate General submitted that since remaining portion of the road is already complete in all respect, therefore further proceedings in the case may be closed for the time being XEN B&R Division has supported the request made by the learned Advocate General as the work cannot be executed on the road during winter season.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 61
Suo motu jurisdiction of Supreme Appellate Court
Advocate General had submitted that reconstruction of the damaged road would only be possible in the next season; as the matter was still under consideration with the concerned authorities; and even if decision was taken at an early date, the work could not be carried out in winter season
Advocate General had further submitted that since remaining portion of the road was already complete in all respects, further proceedings in the case could be closed for the time being
Further proceedings for the time being, were closed by the Supreme Appellate Court and matter was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Learned Advocate General assisted by XEN B&R Division Gilgit submitted that in view of the order dated 13-10-2010 the re-construction of the damaged road would only be possible in the next season, as the matter is still under consideration with concerned, authorities and even if decision is taken at an early date, the work cannot be carried out in winter season. The learned Advocate General submitted that since remaining portion of the road is already complete in all respect, therefore further proceedings in the case may be closed for the time being XEN B&R Division has supported the request made by the learned Advocate General as the work cannot be executed on the road during winter season. This being so, that further proceedings for the time being are closed in this petition and same is disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./421/Glt Order accordingly.