1990 PLP 1516 (SCMR)
PESHAWAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN and another‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1516 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and S.Usman Ali Shah, |
| Parties | PESHAWAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN and another‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1473)‑.‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1516 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1473)‑.‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1516 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and S.Usman Ali Shah,.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1516 (SCMR) (PESHAWAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN and another‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mian M.Ajmal, Additional Advocate‑General, Haji M.A.Qayyum Mazhar, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Imtiaz M.Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record .for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 9th January, 1990.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal dated 12‑3‑1989, passed in Appeal No. 186'of 1988). ‑‑‑‑Art:212(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑‑Nothing exceptional was found in impugned Endings of Service Tribunal having jurisdiction to hear appeal in the matter‑‑‑‑No question of public importance being involved in petition, same was liable to be dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
S.USMAN ALI SHAH, J.‑‑‑This petition for leave to appeal filed by the petitioners is directed against the judgment of the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal dated 12‑3-1989, whereby Appeal No.18G of 1988 of respondent No.l was accepted.' Muhammad Iqbal Khan respondent No.l was an Assistant Excise and Taxation Officer, Peshawar in the year 1986, under the administrative control of the petitioner No.l. He was posted from Peshawar to D.I.Khan on the same post where he was communicated adverse remarks given to him in his A.C.R. for the year 1986;'vide letter No.19053/Estab: ACR dated 17‑9‑1987 (Annexure `A'). The respondent made a representation against these remarks to petitioner No.l being the appellate authority. The said representation was rejected by the petitioner NO vide iettcr.No.10091/Estab: PF‑54, dated 19‑10‑1988. Being aggrieved the respondent No.l filed appeal before the N.‑W.F.P. Service Tribunal, Peshawar (respondent No.2): The learned Chairman and Member of the Tribunal after examining the case of the. respondent No.l, accepted the appeal and expunged the adverse: remarks from his A.C.R: for the year 1986, vide impugned judgment. f ‑fence, this petition for leave to appeal. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that though the remarks of the reporting officer give a good entry of the ACR but the opinion of the counter‑signing authority making adverse entry on the basis of material before him, was wrongly interfered with by the learned Service Tribunal. We have gone through the judgment of the learned Tribunal in the light of the contention raised by the learned counsel. We find nothing exceptional in the impugned finding and the Tribunal has the jurisdiction to hear the appeal in the matter. As we find no question of public importance involved in this petition. Hence, it is, accordingly dismissed. H.B.T./S‑504/S Petition dismissed.